- Score
- 7.5 (+3.05 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.000 · 100.0% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 29.38s · 40.0% faster
Summary
Ring 2.6 1t scores 4.5 on AI BENCHY and ranks #393. It has 10.0 reliability, a 43.5% pass rate, $0.026 total cost, and 48.94s average response time.
What makes Ring 2.6 1t unique: It stands out most in Anti-AI Tricks, where it ranks #1, while Tool Calling is its weakest area at #9.
Recommended alternatives
We recommend choosing one of these models instead:
- Score
- 5.0 (+0.47 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.000 · 100.0% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 5.36s · 89.0% faster
- Score
- 5.1 (+0.58 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.000 · 100.0% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 7.79s · 84.1% faster
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 1T total (63B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Open source
- License
- MIT
4.5
Consistency
9.4
10.0
Total Output Tokens
40,277
Total Input Tokens
7,608
Input Price
$0.075 / 1M
Output Price
$0.625 / 1M
Cache Read Price
N/A
Cache Write Price
N/A
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Flaky tests
2
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#393 Ring 2.6 1t
default- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 02:53 Re-test | 4.5 | 10.0 | $0.026 ↑ | Current run | |
| 2026-07-16 23:16 New test added | 4.8 | 10.0 | $0.026 |