- Rank
- #356
- Total Output Tokens
- 118,380
- Response Time (avg)
- 38.01s
- Total Cost
- $0.000
Cobuddy (medium) vs Ling 2.6 Flash (default)
Ling 2.6 Flash (default) leads on average score with 4.5 vs 4.4. Cobuddy (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.002. Ling 2.6 Flash (default) is faster at 10.21s vs 38.01s, with pass rates of 43.5% vs 29.0%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #348
- Total Output Tokens
- 14,903
- Response Time (avg)
- 10.21s
- Total Cost
- $0.002
Recommended model
Ling 2.6 Flash (default)
It has the best score here (4.5), while responding about 3.7x faster than Cobuddy (medium).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Cobuddy Cobuddy medium Free Available | Ling 2.6 Flash Ling 2.6 Flash default |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| Rank | #356 | #348 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 9.6 |
| Consistency | 7.3 | 9.3 |
| Attempts | 66/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 43.5% | 29.0% |
| Flaky tests | 6 | 2 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 0.000 | 0.024 |
| Total Cost | $0.000 | $0.002 |
| Input Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.010 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.030 / 1M |
| Cache Read Price | N/A | N/A |
| Cache Write Price | N/A | N/A |
| Total Input Tokens | 37,449 | 114,384 |
| Output Tokens | 1,677 | 14,903 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 116,703 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 38.01s | 10.21s |
| Response Time (max) | 309.02s | 36.03s |
| Response Time (total) | 798.15s | 214.31s |
| Parameters | ~21B total (~3B active) | 104B total (7.4B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Open source |
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#356 Cobuddy
medium
No endpoints found for baidu/cobuddy:free.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.1s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
#348 Ling 2.6 Flash
default
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 173ms | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 32ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 8.7 | 7.9 | 91.7% | 1 | 10.00s | 453 | 98 | 4,666 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 6.8 | 8.1 | 58.3% | 1 | 11.81s | 726 | 573 | 0 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 3.7 | 6.7 | 22.2% | 1 | 79.17s | 4,726 | 358 | 30,138 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 11.21s | 813 | 381 | 0 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 1.5 | 5.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 47.38s | 18,324 | 465 | 7,265 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 35.69s | 94,475 | 13,094 | 0 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 6.3 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 17.36s | 8,181 | 275 | 5,591 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 8.48s | 8,004 | 246 | 0 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 2.9 | 4.4 | 22.2% | 2 | 128.15s | 540 | 10 | 49,454 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 5.20s | 819 | 24 | 0 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 4.2 | 9.9 | 0.0% | 0 | 23.23s | 498 | 76 | 3,782 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 4.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.45s | 540 | 109 | 0 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 11.60s | 508 | 64 | 2,842 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.52s | 732 | 81 | 0 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 3.6 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 12.83s | 561 | 189 | 5,808 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 6.51s | 729 | 151 | 0 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 11.19s | 3,505 | 133 | 294 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 18.80s | 7,324 | 229 | 0 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 36.98s | 153 | 9 | 6,863 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.06s | 222 | 15 | 0 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
CobuddymediumFree AvailablevsMercury 2noneCobuddymediumFree AvailablevsGranite 4.2 8BnoneLing 2.6 FlashdefaultvsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailableLing 2.6 FlashdefaultvsNemotron 3 SupernoneFree AvailableTrinity Large PreviewdefaultFree AvailablevsCobuddymediumFree AvailableCobuddymediumFree AvailablevsKAT Coder AIR V2.5defaultLing 2.6 FlashdefaultvsLaguna S 2.1lowFree AvailableCobuddymediumFree AvailablevsNemotron 3 SupernoneFree AvailableLing 2.6 FlashdefaultvsGPT-5.4 NanononeDeepSeek V3.2nonevsLing 2.6 FlashdefaultGranite 4.2 8BnonevsLing 2.6 FlashdefaultCobuddymediumFree AvailablevsRing 2.6 1tdefault