Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Cobuddy vs inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash

Summary

Cobuddy vs Ling-2.6-flash benchmark comparison: Cobuddy leads on average score with 4.9 vs 4.9. Cobuddy has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.001. Ling-2.6-flash is faster at 9.34s vs 39.90s, with pass rates of 47.6% vs 31.8%.

Recommended model: Ling-2.6-flash - Its score stays close to the best score here (4.9 vs 4.9), while responding about 4.3x faster than Cobuddy.

Last updated at: 2026-07-02

Metric Cobuddy Cobuddy medium Release: 2026-05-06 Ling-2.6-flash Ling-2.6-flash none Release: 2026-04-21
Score 4.9 4.9
Rank #145 #148
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.5 9.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 47.6% 31.8%
Flaky tests 6 2
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.000 0.005
Total Cost $0.000 $0.001
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.010 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 37,449 40,718
Output Tokens 1,677 2,878
Reasoning Tokens 116,703 0
Response Time (avg) 39.90s 9.34s
Response Time (max) 309.02s 35.34s
Response Time (total) 797.98s 177.48s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#145 Cobuddy

medium
No endpoints found for baidu/cobuddy:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#148 Ling-2.6-flash

none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 8.7 7.9 91.7% 1 10.00s 453 98 4,666
Ling-2.6-flash 6.8 8.1 58.3% 1 11.81s 726 573 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.7 6.7 22.2% 1 79.17s 4,726 358 30,138
Ling-2.6-flash 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 11.21s 813 381 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 47.38s 18,324 465 7,265
Ling-2.6-flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 35.34s 20,818 1,069 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 6.3 5.8 66.7% 1 17.36s 8,181 275 5,591
Ling-2.6-flash 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 8.48s 8,004 246 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 2.9 4.4 22.2% 2 128.15s 540 10 49,454
Ling-2.6-flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 4.95s 810 24 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 4.2 9.9 0.0% 0 23.23s 498 76 3,782
Ling-2.6-flash 4.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.45s 540 109 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 9.8 10.0 100.0% 0 11.60s 508 64 2,842
Ling-2.6-flash 9.8 10.0 100.0% 0 5.52s 732 81 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.6 7.2 22.2% 1 12.83s 561 189 5,808
Ling-2.6-flash 2.9 7.2 11.1% 1 6.51s 729 151 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 11.19s 3,505 133 294
Ling-2.6-flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 18.80s 7,324 229 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 36.98s 153 9 6,863
Ling-2.6-flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.06s 222 15 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

CobuddymediumvsGPT-4o-mininoneCobuddymediumvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneCobuddymediumvsNemotron 3 SupernoneFree AvailableTrinity Large PreviewnonevsCobuddymediumCobuddymediumvsRing-2.6-1TnoneCobuddymediumvsGPT-5.4 NanononeLing-2.6-flashnonevsMiniMax M2.5mediumCobuddymediumvsQwen3.5-9BnoneCobuddymediumvsMiMo-V2.5noneLing-2.6-flashnonevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumCobuddymediumvsNorth Mini CodenoneFree AvailableCobuddymediumvsQwen3 Coder Nextnone