Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Trinity Large Preview vs MiniMax: MiniMax M2.5

Trinity Large Preview leads on average score with 4.8 vs 4.6. Trinity Large Preview has the lower benchmark cost at $0.008 vs $0.340. Trinity Large Preview is faster at 2.98s vs 68.27s, with pass rates of 21.2% vs 45.5%.

Recommended modelTrinity Large PreviewIt has the best score here (4.8), while costing about 43.9x less than MiniMax M2.5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Trinity Large Preview Trinity Large Preview none Release: 2026-01-27 MiniMax M2.5 MiniMax M2.5 medium Release: 2026-02-12
Score 4.8 4.6
Rank #179 #186
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 6.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 21.2% 45.5%
Flaky tests 2 10
Total Runs 63 66
Cost per result 0.017 8.648
Total Cost $0.008 $0.340
Input Price $0.243 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Output Price $0.243 / 1M $0.900 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 29,828 142,561
Output Tokens 2,169 125,442
Reasoning Tokens 0 339,935
Response Time (avg) 2.98s 68.27s
Response Time (max) 14.34s 251.36s
Response Time (total) 56.57s 955.75s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#179 Trinity Large Preview

none
No endpoints found for arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#186 MiniMax M2.5

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Trinity Large Preview 3.7 7.7 11.1% 1 14.34s 738 397 0
MiniMax M2.5 3.4 9.1 0.0% 0 188.58s 6,076 357 106,177

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair