- Rank
- #349
- Total Output Tokens
- 2,169
- Response Time (avg)
- 2.83s
- Total Cost
- $0.008
Trinity Large Preview (default) vs Granite 4.2 8B
The average score is effectively tied at 4.4 vs 4.4. Trinity Large Preview (default) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.008 vs $0.037. Trinity Large Preview (default) is faster at 2.83s vs 84.66s, with pass rates of 20.3% vs 15.9%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #350
- Total Output Tokens
- 133,268
- Response Time (avg)
- 84.66s
- Total Cost
- $0.037
Recommended model
Trinity Large Preview (default)
It has the best score here (4.4), while costing about 4.7x less than Granite 4.2 8B.
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Trinity Large Preview Trinity Large Preview default Free Available | Granite 4.2 8B Granite 4.2 8B none |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Rank | #349 | #350 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 9.1 |
| Consistency | 9.0 | 9.3 |
| Attempts | 66/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 20.3% | 15.9% |
| Flaky tests | 2 | 2 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 0.017 | 1.206 |
| Total Cost | $0.008 | $0.037 |
| Input Price | $0.243 / 1M | $0.060 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.243 / 1M | $0.250 / 1M |
| Cache Read Price | N/A | $0.015 / 1M |
| Cache Write Price | N/A | N/A |
| Total Input Tokens | 29,828 | 226,872 |
| Output Tokens | 2,169 | 133,268 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 0 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 2.83s | 84.66s |
| Response Time (max) | 14.34s | 747.17s |
| Response Time (total) | 56.65s | 1947.17s |
| Parameters | 398B total (13B active) | 8B |
| Availability | Open source | Open source |
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#349 Trinity Large Preview
default
No endpoints found for arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
#350 IBM: Granite 4.2 8B
none
Provider returned error
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.2s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 88ms | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Granite 4.2 8B | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 49.21s | 169,086 | 2,463 | 0 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 3.1 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 2.07s | 651 | 550 | 0 | |
| Granite 4.2 8B | 4.9 | 8.1 | 33.3% | 1 | 17.77s | 669 | 6,026 | 0 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 3.7 | 7.7 | 11.1% | 1 | 14.34s | 738 | 397 | 0 | |
| Granite 4.2 8B | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 105.60s | 8,358 | 47,944 | 0 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 1.5 | 5.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 8.91s | 12,053 | 294 | 0 | |
| Granite 4.2 8B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 424.28s | 30,500 | 29,755 | 0 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.26s | 6,900 | 186 | 0 | |
| Granite 4.2 8B | 2.9 | 5.8 | 16.7% | 1 | 1.05s | 7,629 | 237 | 0 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 877ms | 738 | 25 | 0 | |
| Granite 4.2 8B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 53.62s | 696 | 38,145 | 0 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 4.5 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 873ms | 498 | 104 | 0 | |
| Granite 4.2 8B | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 770ms | 534 | 153 | 0 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 3.5 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 822ms | 678 | 63 | 0 | |
| Granite 4.2 8B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 79.50s | 375 | 1,275 | 0 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 3.6 | 7.7 | 11.1% | 1 | 1.97s | 669 | 265 | 0 | |
| Granite 4.2 8B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 107.60s | 472 | 6,964 | 0 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.67s | 6,699 | 267 | 0 | |
| Granite 4.2 8B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.39s | 8,331 | 291 | 0 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 777ms | 204 | 18 | 0 | |
| Granite 4.2 8B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 14.60s | 222 | 15 | 0 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Granite 4.2 8BnonevsKAT Coder AIR V2.5defaultTrinity Large PreviewdefaultFree AvailablevsNemotron 3 SupernoneFree AvailableCobuddymediumFree AvailablevsGranite 4.2 8BnoneTrinity Large PreviewdefaultFree AvailablevsCobuddymediumFree AvailableTrinity Large PreviewdefaultFree AvailablevsMercury 2noneGranite 4.2 8BnonevsRing 2.6 1tdefaultGranite 4.2 8BnonevsLing 2.6 FlashdefaultGranite 4.2 8BnonevsMiniMax M2.5mediumTrinity Large PreviewdefaultFree AvailablevsMiniMax M2.5mediumTrinity Large PreviewdefaultFree AvailablevsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailableTrinity Large PreviewdefaultFree AvailablevsLaguna S 2.1lowFree AvailableGranite 4.2 8BnonevsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree Available