AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com
#307

Granite 4.2 8B

IBM Granite Release: 2026-09-02 Tested on: 2026-09-02 02:14 ibm-granite/granite-4.2-8b::none
8BDenseOpen source

Summary

Granite 4.2 8B scores 4.3 on AI BENCHY and ranks #307. It has 8.6 reliability, a 16.7% pass rate, $0.037 total cost, and 86.27s average response time.

What makes Granite 4.2 8B unique: It stands out most in Coding, where it ranks #1, while Data parsing and extraction is its weakest area at #9.

Model facts

Researched on 2026-09-02

Reported
Parameters
8B
Architecture
Dense
Availability
Open source
License
Apache-2.0

IBM publishes the weights, runnable implementation guidance, and training methodology under Apache-2.0.

Score

4.3

Consistency

9.3

Total Cost (Current Price)

$0.037 ↑ +42.4%

Tested at: $0.026

Total Output Tokens

130,805

Total Input Tokens

57,786

Input Price

$0.060 / 1M

Output Price

$0.250 / 1M

Tests Correct

Wrong Tests: 19

Attempt pass rate: 16.7%

Flaky tests

2

Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).

Response Time (avg)

86.27s

Response Time (max): 747.17s

Response Time (total): 1897.96s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#307 IBM: Granite 4.2 8B

none
Provider returned error
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.2s
Tokens
0 tok

Price History

Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.

Date Input Price Output Price
2026-09-10 11:38 $0.060 / 1M $0.250 / 1M

Charts

Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Quick Compare

Category Breakdown

Category Score Consistency Tests Correct
Anti-AI Tricks 4.9 8.1
Coding 5.5 10.0
Combined 3.0 10.0
Data parsing and extraction 2.9 5.8
Domain specific 3.0 10.0
General Intelligence 5.0 10.0
Instructions following 3.0 10.0
Puzzle Solving 3.0 10.0
Tool Calling 10.0 10.0
Trivia 3.0 10.0

Compared models