- Score
- 9.4 (+5.15 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.183 · 5.5% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 6.24s · 95.9% faster
Z.ai
Release: 2026-01-19
Tested on: 2026-10-01 00:17
z-ai/glm-4.7-flash::medium
30B total (3B active)MoEOpen source
(medium)
(none)
Summary
GLM 4.7 Flash scores 4.2 on AI BENCHY and ranks #349. It has 9.4 reliability, a 30.4% pass rate, $0.193 total cost, and 150.90s average response time.
What makes GLM 4.7 Flash unique: It uses unusually many reasoning tokens, which can help explain its slower or more expensive runs.
Recommended alternatives
We recommend choosing one of these models instead:
- Score
- 8.3 (+4.04 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.000 · 100.0% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 88.74s · 41.2% faster
- Score
- 7.5 (+3.33 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.000 · 100.0% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 29.38s · 80.5% faster
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 30B total (3B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Open source
- License
- MIT
4.2
Consistency
7.1
9.4
$0.193
Total Output Tokens
464,375
Total Input Tokens
228,711
Input Price
$0.061 / 1M
Output Price
$0.400 / 1M
Cache Read Price
N/A
Cache Write Price
N/A
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Flaky tests
8
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#349 GLM 4.7 Flash
medium
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 186.2s
- Tokens
- 12,112 tok
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 00:17 Re-test | 4.2 | 9.4 | $0.193 | Current run | |
| 2026-07-16 22:32 New test added | 4.3 | 7.8 | $0.166 | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:29 New test added | 4.4 | 6.7 | $0.054 | Compare | |
| 2026-05-21 23:50 Suite changed | 4.5 | 8.3 | $0.054 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-11 01:19 First recorded run | 4.6 | N/A | $0.046 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price | Cache Read Price | Cache Write Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 12:51 | $0.060 / 1M | $0.400 / 1M | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-09-08 21:53 | $0.061 / 1M | $0.400 / 1M | N/A | N/A |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
GLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsMiniMax M2.5mediumGLM 4.7 Flashmediumvsgpt-oss-120bnoneGLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsMercury 2noneGLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsMercury 2.5noneGLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsCobuddymediumFree AvailableGLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsQwen3.5-9BmediumGLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsGranite 4.2 8BnoneGLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsLing 3.0 TinynoneGLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsTrinity Large PreviewnoneFree AvailableGLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsGranite 4.1 8bnone
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 3.9 | 9.6 | |
| Anti-AI Tricks | 4.7 | 5.9 | |
| Coding | 3.2 | 7.4 | |
| Combined | 2.9 | 6.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 6.3 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 3.5 | 4.4 | |
| General Intelligence | 3.6 | 9.7 | |
| Instructions following | 6.2 | 5.8 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 2.9 | 7.2 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |