AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com
#162

GLM 4.7 Flash

Z.ai Release: 2026-01-19 Tested on: 2026-06-04 13:29 z-ai/glm-4.7-flash::medium
(medium) (none)

Summary

GLM 4.7 Flash scores 4.3 on AI BENCHY and ranks #162. It has 6.7 reliability, a 33.3% pass rate, $0.054 total cost, and 35.10s average response time.

What makes GLM 4.7 Flash unique: Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range.

Score

4.3

Consistency

6.8

Total Output Tokens

132,833

Total Input Tokens

37,206

Input Price

$0.060 / 1M

Output Price

$0.400 / 1M

Tests Correct

Wrong Tests: 17

Attempt pass rate: 33.3%

Flaky tests

8

Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).

Response Time (avg)

35.10s

Response Time (max): 174.55s

Response Time (total): 456.24s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#162 GLM 4.7 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
186.2s
Tokens
12,112 tok

Run history

Tested on Score Reliability Tests Correct Total Cost Compare
2026-06-04 13:29 New test added 4.4 6.7 $0.054 Current run
2026-05-21 23:50 Suite changed 4.5 8.3 $0.054 Compare
2026-04-11 01:19 First recorded run 4.6 N/A $0.046 Compare

This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.

Price History

Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.

Date Input Price Output Price
2026-06-04 15:40 $0.060 / 1M $0.400 / 1M

Charts

Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Quick Compare

Category Breakdown

Category Score Consistency Tests Correct
Anti-AI Tricks 4.7 5.9
Coding 3.2 7.4
Combined 2.8 2.1
Data parsing and extraction 6.3 10.0
Domain specific 3.5 4.4
General Intelligence 3.6 9.7
Instructions following 6.2 5.8
Puzzle Solving 2.9 7.2
Tool Calling 10.0 10.0
Trivia 3.0 10.0

Compared models