#266 GLM 4.7 Flash
medium
Invalid SVG
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 186.2s
- Tokens
- 12,112 tok
Z.ai
Release: 2026-01-19
Tested on: 2026-08-14 01:33
z-ai/glm-4.7-flash::medium
30B total (3B active)MoEOpen source
(medium)
(none)
Summary
GLM 4.7 Flash scores 4.3 on AI BENCHY and ranks #266. It has 8.6 reliability, a 31.8% pass rate, $0.168 total cost, and 134.34s average response time.
What makes GLM 4.7 Flash unique: It uses unusually many reasoning tokens, which can help explain its slower or more expensive runs.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 30B total (3B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Open source
- License
- MIT
4.3
Consistency
7.0
8.6
$0.168
Total Output Tokens
419,534
Total Input Tokens
79,104
Input Price
$0.060 / 1M
Output Price
$0.400 / 1M
Flaky tests
8
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 01:33 Re-test | 4.3 | 8.6 | $0.168 | Current run | |
| 2026-07-16 22:32 New test added | 4.3 | 7.8 | $0.166 | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:29 New test added | 4.4 | 6.7 | $0.054 | Compare | |
| 2026-05-21 23:50 Suite changed | 4.5 | 8.3 | $0.054 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-11 01:19 First recorded run | 4.6 | N/A | $0.046 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 01:33 · Current run | 66/66 attempts | 4.3 | 7.0 | 8.6 | 4/22 | 8 | 419,534 | 79,104 | $0.168 | 134.34s |
| 2026-05-21 23:50 · Suite changed | 60/60 attempts | 4.5 | 6.7 | 8.3 | 4/20 | 8 | 132,820 | 0 | $0.054 | 35.09s |
| Difference | — | -0.2 | +0.3 | +0.3 | 0 | 0 | +286714 | +79104 | +$0.114 | +99251ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 60/60 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-16 15:36 | $0.061 / 1M | $0.400 / 1M |
| 2026-08-14 12:51 | $0.060 / 1M | $0.400 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
GLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsLaguna S 2.1noneFree AvailableGLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsGrok 4.20noneGLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsMiniMax M2.5mediumGLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsLing 3.0 TinynoneGLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsQwen3 Coder NextmediumGLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsGranite 4.1 8BnoneGLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsMercury 2noneGLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsNemotron 3.5 LightningnoneFree AvailableGLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsCobuddymediumGLM 4.7 FlashmediumvsLing 3.0 Tinyhigh
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 4.7 | 5.9 | |
| Coding | 3.2 | 7.4 | |
| Combined | 2.9 | 6.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 6.3 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 3.5 | 4.4 | |
| General Intelligence | 3.6 | 9.7 | |
| Instructions following | 6.2 | 5.8 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 2.9 | 7.2 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |