Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Trinity Large Preview vs Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash

Trinity Large Preview leads on average score with 4.8 vs 4.3. Trinity Large Preview has the lower benchmark cost at $0.008 vs $0.166. Trinity Large Preview is faster at 2.98s vs 142.59s, with pass rates of 21.2% vs 31.8%.

Recommended modelTrinity Large PreviewIt has the best score here (4.8), while costing about 21.4x less than GLM 4.7 Flash (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric Trinity Large Preview Trinity Large Preview none Release: 2026-01-27 GLM 4.7 Flash GLM 4.7 Flash medium Release: 2026-01-19
Score 4.8 4.3
Rank #183 #194
Reliability 10.0 7.8
Consistency 8.9 7.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 21.2% 31.8%
Flaky tests 2 8
Total Runs 63 66
Cost per result 0.017 4.147
Total Cost $0.008 $0.166
Input Price $0.243 / 1M $0.061 / 1M
Output Price $0.243 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 29,828 79,051
Output Tokens 2,169 43,754
Reasoning Tokens 0 374,109
Response Time (avg) 2.98s 142.59s
Response Time (max) 14.34s 1539.97s
Response Time (total) 56.57s 1996.21s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#183 Trinity Large Preview

none
No endpoints found for arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#194 GLM 4.7 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
186.2s
Tokens
12,112 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Trinity Large Preview 3.7 7.7 11.1% 1 14.34s 738 397 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 3.2 7.4 11.1% 1 55.33s 3,106 4,981 22,387

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair