Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Trinity Large Preview vs Poolside: Laguna S 2.1

Laguna S 2.1 (low) leads on average score with 5.0 vs 4.8. Trinity Large Preview has the lower benchmark cost at $0.008 vs $0.091. Trinity Large Preview is faster at 2.98s vs 85.35s, with pass rates of 21.2% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelTrinity Large PreviewIts score stays close to the best score here (4.8 vs 5.0), while costing about 11.7x less than Laguna S 2.1 (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Trinity Large Preview Trinity Large Preview none Release: 2026-01-27 Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 low Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available
Score 4.8 5.0
Rank #192 #181
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 8.9 7.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 21.2% 25.8%
Flaky tests 2 6
Total Runs 63 66
Cost per result 0.017 3.022
Total Cost $0.008 $0.091
Input Price $0.243 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.243 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 29,828 118,746
Output Tokens 2,169 67,823
Reasoning Tokens 0 383,885
Response Time (avg) 2.98s 85.35s
Response Time (max) 14.34s 814.73s
Response Time (total) 56.57s 1877.64s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#192 Trinity Large Preview

none
No endpoints found for arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#181 Laguna S 2.1

low
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.6s
Tokens
1,314 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Trinity Large Preview 3.7 7.7 11.1% 1 14.34s 738 397 0
Laguna S 2.1 3.8 7.1 22.2% 1 167.51s 7,917 58,111 119,138

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair