- Rank
- #81
- Total Output Tokens
- 648,854
- Response Time (avg)
- 88.74s
- Total Cost
- $0.000
Ling 3.1 Flash (medium) vs GLM 4.7 Flash (medium)
Ling 3.1 Flash (medium) leads on average score with 8.3 vs 4.2. Ling 3.1 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.193. Ling 3.1 Flash (medium) is faster at 88.74s vs 150.90s, with pass rates of 71.0% vs 30.4%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #349
- Total Output Tokens
- 464,375
- Response Time (avg)
- 150.90s
- Total Cost
- $0.193
Recommended model
Ling 3.1 Flash (medium)
It has the best score here (8.3), while responding about 1.7x faster than GLM 4.7 Flash (medium).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash medium | GLM 4.7 Flash GLM 4.7 Flash medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 8.3 | 4.2 |
| Rank | #81 | #349 |
| Reliability | 9.6 | 9.4 |
| Consistency | 8.8 | 7.1 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 71.0% | 30.4% |
| Flaky tests | 3 | 8 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 0.000 | 4.822 |
| Total Cost | $0.000 | $0.193 |
| Input Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.061 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.400 / 1M |
| Cache Read Price | N/A | N/A |
| Cache Write Price | N/A | N/A |
| Total Input Tokens | 369,495 | 228,711 |
| Output Tokens | 172,852 | 42,254 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 476,002 | 422,121 |
| Response Time (avg) | 88.74s | 150.90s |
| Response Time (max) | 567.88s | 1539.97s |
| Response Time (total) | 2041.10s | 2414.33s |
| Parameters | 560B total (25B active) | 30B total (3B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Open source |
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#81 Ling 3.1 Flash
medium- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 101.1s
- Tokens
- 11,607 tok
#349 GLM 4.7 Flash
medium
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 186.2s
- Tokens
- 12,112 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 100.10s | 233,792 | 12,506 | 12,249 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 3.9 | 9.6 | 0.0% | 0 | 399.20s | 149,607 | 0 | 44,841 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.24s | 750 | 1,152 | 3,396 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 4.7 | 5.9 | 41.7% | 2 | 14.95s | 555 | 1,122 | 6,110 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 87.15s | 8,298 | 19,577 | 62,002 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 3.2 | 7.4 | 11.1% | 1 | 55.33s | 3,106 | 4,981 | 22,387 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 6.6 | 9.1 | 50.0% | 0 | 306.46s | 106,402 | 26,806 | 100,471 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 2.9 | 6.0 | 16.7% | 1 | 802.77s | 59,030 | 2,585 | 305,678 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 20.92s | 8,016 | 1,334 | 3,754 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 6.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 1.51s | 7,107 | 584 | 2,755 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 262.25s | 837 | 100,307 | 228,869 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 3.5 | 4.4 | 33.3% | 2 | 96.74s | 696 | 31,500 | 28,565 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 5.3 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 7.28s | 546 | 152 | 1,820 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 3.6 | 9.7 | 0.0% | 0 | 18.14s | 318 | 18 | 2,138 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.57s | 744 | 323 | 1,317 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 6.2 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 2.97s | 636 | 388 | 2,181 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 42.32s | 747 | 5,455 | 40,080 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 12.93s | 521 | 781 | 5,255 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 2.8 | 2.1 | 33.3% | 1 | 47.17s | 9,135 | 3,850 | 12,018 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 15.95s | 6,949 | 224 | 1,014 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 32.55s | 228 | 1,390 | 10,026 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 11.13s | 186 | 71 | 1,197 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Ling 3.1 FlashmediumvsGrok 4.5highLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsKimi K3maxgpt-oss-120bnonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumGemini 3.5 FlashhighvsLing 3.1 FlashmediumLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsGPT-5.6 TerrahighMercury 2.5nonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsGLM 5.2highDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731highvsLing 3.1 FlashmediumSeed-2.0-CodelowvsLing 3.1 FlashmediumLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsMuse Spark 1.1highMercury 2nonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsInklinghighFree Available