Navigate
Advertise here

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (max) vs Ling 3.1 Flash (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 8.2 vs 8.3. Ling 3.1 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.757. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (max) is faster at 78.20s vs 88.74s, with pass rates of 76.8% vs 71.0%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-19

Compared models

Rank
#100
Total Output Tokens
1,170,181
Response Time (avg)
78.20s
Total Cost
$0.757
Rank
#97
Total Output Tokens
571,666
Response Time (avg)
88.74s
Total Cost
$0.000
Recommended model DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (max)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (8.2) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 max Release: 2026-10-18 Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash medium Release: 2026-10-03
Score 8.2 8.3
Rank #100 #97
Reliability 10.0 9.6
Consistency 8.2 8.8
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 76.8% 71.0%
Flaky tests 5 3
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 5.041 0.000
Total Cost $0.757 $0.000
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.003 / 1M N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 360,065 369,495
Output Tokens 7,711 172,852
Reasoning Tokens 1,162,470 476,002
Response Time (avg) 78.20s 88.74s
Response Time (max) 605.14s 567.88s
Response Time (total) 1798.65s 2041.10s
Parameters ~748B total (~16B active) 560B total (25B active)
Availability Open source Closed

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#100 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

max
Cost
$0.018
Time
135.0s
Tokens
35,163 tok

#97 Ling 3.1 Flash

medium
Cost
$0.000
Time
101.1s
Tokens
11,607 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 5.6 4.2 66.7% 2 199.23s 7,509 111 475,423
Ling 3.1 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 87.15s 8,298 19,577 62,002

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017maxvsGemini 4 ArgonlowDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017maxvsGrok 4.5highDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017maxvsGLM 5.2mediumGemini 4 ArgonlowvsLing 3.1 FlashmediumDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017maxvsQwen3.7 PlusmediumLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsGrok 4.5highDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017maxvsGPT-5.6 TerramediumClaude Opus 4.8mediumvsDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017maxDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017maxvsGPT-6 LunamediumLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsKimi K3maxGemini 3.5 FlashhighvsLing 3.1 FlashmediumClaude Haiku 5.5highvsLing 3.1 Flashmedium