Navigate
Advertise here

Qwen3.5-9B (medium) vs GLM 4.7 Flash (medium)

GLM 4.7 Flash (medium) leads on average score with 4.2 vs 4.0. Qwen3.5-9B (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.106 vs $0.193. Qwen3.5-9B (medium) is faster at 110.18s vs 150.90s, with pass rates of 26.1% vs 30.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-03

Compared models

Rank
#354
Total Output Tokens
458,993
Response Time (avg)
110.18s
Total Cost
$0.106
Rank
#349
Total Output Tokens
464,375
Response Time (avg)
150.90s
Total Cost
$0.193
Recommended model Qwen3.5-9B (medium)

Its score stays close to the best score here (4.0 vs 4.2), while costing about 1.8x less than GLM 4.7 Flash (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.5-9B medium Release: 2026-03-02 GLM 4.7 Flash GLM 4.7 Flash medium Release: 2026-01-19
Score 4.0 4.2
Rank #354 #349
Reliability 8.7 9.4
Consistency 7.9 7.1
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 26.1% 30.4%
Flaky tests 6 8
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 3.523 4.822
Total Cost $0.106 $0.193
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.061 / 1M
Output Price $0.150 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 387,323 228,711
Output Tokens 48,562 42,254
Reasoning Tokens 410,431 422,121
Response Time (avg) 110.18s 150.90s
Response Time (max) 569.97s 1539.97s
Response Time (total) 1873.00s 2414.33s
Parameters 9B 30B total (3B active)
Availability Open source Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#354 Qwen3.5-9B

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
35.9s
Tokens
3,030 tok

#349 GLM 4.7 Flash

medium
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
Cost
$0.000
Time
186.2s
Tokens
12,112 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-9B 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 100.88s 2,396 7,890 41,129
GLM 4.7 Flash 3.2 7.4 11.1% 1 55.33s 3,106 4,981 22,387

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

gpt-oss-120bnonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumMercury 2.5nonevsQwen3.5-9BmediumMercury 2.5nonevsGLM 4.7 Flashmediumgpt-oss-120bnonevsQwen3.5-9BmediumMercury 2nonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumGranite 4.2 8BnonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumTrinity Large PreviewnoneFree AvailablevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumLing 3.0 TinynonevsQwen3.5-9BmediumKAT Coder AIR V2.5nonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumGranite 4.1 8bnonevsQwen3.5-9BmediumNemotron 3.5 LightningnoneFree AvailablevsQwen3.5-9BmediumNemotron 3 SupernoneFree AvailablevsGLM 4.7 Flashmedium