Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Granite 4.1 8B vs Qwen3.5-9B (medium)

Granite 4.1 8B leads on average score with 4.0 vs 3.8. Granite 4.1 8B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.007 vs $0.036. Granite 4.1 8B is faster at 1.45s vs 82.24s, with pass rates of 9.1% vs 25.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#224
Total Output Tokens
5,996
Response Time (avg)
1.45s
Total Cost
$0.007
Rank
#227
Total Output Tokens
238,561
Response Time (avg)
82.24s
Total Cost
$0.036
Recommended model Granite 4.1 8B

It has the best score here (4.0), while costing about 5.7x less than Qwen3.5-9B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Granite 4.1 8B Granite 4.1 8B none Release: 2026-05-01 Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.5-9B medium Release: 2026-03-02
Score 4.0 3.8
Rank #224 #227
Reliability 10.0 5.0
Consistency 10.0 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 9.1% 25.8%
Flaky tests 0 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.315 1.187
Total Cost $0.007 $0.036
Input Price $0.050 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.100 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 113,827 17,070
Output Tokens 5,996 29,045
Reasoning Tokens 0 209,516
Response Time (avg) 1.45s 82.24s
Response Time (max) 16.67s 226.38s
Response Time (total) 31.96s 1315.88s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#224 IBM: Granite 4.1 8B

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
3.2s
Tokens
491 tok

#227 Qwen3.5-9B

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
35.9s
Tokens
3,030 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Granite 4.1 8B 4.5 10.0 0.0% 0 775ms 8,344 525 0
Qwen3.5-9B 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 100.88s 2,396 7,890 41,129

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair