Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Granite 4.1 8B vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (low)

Granite 4.1 8B leads on average score with 4.0 vs 3.8. Ling 3.0 Tiny (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.007. Granite 4.1 8B is faster at 1.45s vs 66.85s, with pass rates of 9.1% vs 19.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-07

Rank
#238
Total Output Tokens
5,996
Response Time (avg)
1.45s
Total Cost
$0.007
Rank
#241
Total Output Tokens
977,836
Response Time (avg)
66.85s
Total Cost
$0.000
Recommended model Granite 4.1 8B

It has the best score here (4.0), while responding about 46.0x faster than Ling 3.0 Tiny (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Granite 4.1 8B Granite 4.1 8B none Release: 2026-05-01 Ling 3.0 Tiny Ling 3.0 Tiny low Release: 2026-08-07 Free Available
Score 4.0 3.8
Rank #238 #241
Reliability 10.0 9.7
Consistency 10.0 9.7
Benchmark coverage 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 9.1% 19.7%
Flaky tests 0 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.315 0.000
Total Cost $0.007 $0.000
Input Price $0.050 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Output Price $0.100 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 113,827 99,842
Output Tokens 5,996 152,159
Reasoning Tokens 0 825,677
Response Time (avg) 1.45s 66.85s
Response Time (max) 16.67s 252.08s
Response Time (total) 31.96s 1470.69s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#238 IBM: Granite 4.1 8B

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
3.2s
Tokens
491 tok

#241 Ling 3.0 Tiny

low
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
200.0s
Tokens
5,030 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Granite 4.1 8B 4.5 10.0 0.0% 0 775ms 8,344 525 0
Ling 3.0 Tiny 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 170.73s 7,619 56,012 170,220

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair