Navigate
Advertise here

Granite 4.1 8b (default) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (low)

Granite 4.1 8b (default) leads on average score with 3.8 vs 3.7. Ling 3.0 Tiny (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.007. Granite 4.1 8b (default) is faster at 1.38s vs 63.15s, with pass rates of 8.7% vs 18.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-26

Compared models

Rank
#414
Total Output Tokens
5,996
Response Time (avg)
1.38s
Total Cost
$0.007
Rank
#418
Total Output Tokens
868,004
Response Time (avg)
63.15s
Total Cost
$0.000
Recommended model Granite 4.1 8b (default)

It has the best score here (3.8), while responding about 45.7x faster than Ling 3.0 Tiny (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Granite 4.1 8b Granite 4.1 8b default Release: 2026-05-01 Ling 3.0 Tiny Ling 3.0 Tiny low Release: 2026-08-07
Score 3.8 3.7
Rank #414 #418
Reliability 10.0 9.6
Consistency 10.0 9.7
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 8.7% 18.8%
Flaky tests 0 1
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.315 0.000
Total Cost $0.007 $0.000
Input Price $0.050 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Output Price $0.100 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 113,836 99,662
Output Tokens 5,996 146,555
Reasoning Tokens 0 732,977
Response Time (avg) 1.38s 63.15s
Response Time (max) 16.67s 252.08s
Response Time (total) 31.81s 1389.35s
Parameters 8B 7.9B total (1.3B active)
Availability Open source Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#414 Granite 4.1 8b

default
Cost
$0.001
Time
3.2s
Tokens
491 tok

#418 Ling 3.0 Tiny

low
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
Cost
$0.000
Time
200.0s
Tokens
5,030 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Granite 4.1 8b 4.5 10.0 0.0% 0 775ms 8,344 525 0
Ling 3.0 Tiny 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 170.73s 7,619 56,012 170,220

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Granite 4.1 8bdefaultvsNemotron 3.5 LightningnoneFree AvailableLing 3.0 TinylowvsXing4.0 29b A4bmediumFree AvailableGranite 4.1 8bdefaultvsXing4.0 29b A4bmediumFree AvailableGranite 4.1 8bdefaultvsLing 3.0 TinyhighLing 3.0 TinylowvsNemotron 3.5 LightningnoneFree AvailableGranite 4.1 8bdefaultvsLing 3.0 TinymediumGranite 4.1 8bdefaultvsQwen3.5-9BmediumGranite 4.1 8bdefaultvsMercury 2.5noneLing 3.0 TinylowvsGrok 4.20noneCommand A+mediumvsLing 3.0 TinylowGranite 4.1 8bdefaultvsgpt-oss-120bnoneLing 3.0 TinylowvsQwen3.5-9Bmedium