Navigate
Advertise here

Ling 3.0 Tiny (low) vs Qwen3.5-9B (medium)

Qwen3.5-9B (medium) leads on average score with 4.0 vs 3.7. Ling 3.0 Tiny (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.106. Ling 3.0 Tiny (low) is faster at 63.15s vs 110.18s, with pass rates of 18.8% vs 26.1%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-26

Compared models

Rank
#418
Total Output Tokens
868,004
Response Time (avg)
63.15s
Total Cost
$0.000
Rank
#408
Total Output Tokens
447,247
Response Time (avg)
110.18s
Total Cost
$0.106
Recommended model Qwen3.5-9B (medium)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (4.0) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric Ling 3.0 Tiny Ling 3.0 Tiny low Release: 2026-08-07 Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.5-9B medium Release: 2026-03-02
Score 3.7 4.0
Rank #418 #408
Reliability 9.6 8.7
Consistency 9.7 7.9
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 18.8% 26.1%
Flaky tests 1 6
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.000 3.523
Total Cost $0.000 $0.106
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 99,662 387,323
Output Tokens 146,555 48,562
Reasoning Tokens 732,977 410,431
Response Time (avg) 63.15s 110.18s
Response Time (max) 252.08s 569.97s
Response Time (total) 1389.35s 1873.00s
Parameters 7.9B total (1.3B active) 9B
Availability Open source Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#418 Ling 3.0 Tiny

low
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
Cost
$0.000
Time
200.0s
Tokens
5,030 tok

#408 Qwen3.5-9B

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
35.9s
Tokens
3,030 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.0 Tiny 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 170.73s 7,619 56,012 170,220
Qwen3.5-9B 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 100.88s 2,396 7,890 41,129

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Ling 3.0 TinylowvsXing4.0 29b A4bmediumFree AvailableMercury 2.5nonevsQwen3.5-9BmediumLing 3.0 TinylowvsNemotron 3.5 LightningnoneFree Availablegpt-oss-120bnonevsQwen3.5-9BmediumGranite 4.1 8bdefaultvsLing 3.0 TinylowLing 3.0 TinydefaultvsQwen3.5-9BmediumGranite 4.1 8bdefaultvsQwen3.5-9BmediumNemotron 3.5 LightningnoneFree AvailablevsQwen3.5-9BmediumLing 3.0 TinylowvsGrok 4.20noneCommand A+mediumvsLing 3.0 TinylowMercury 2nonevsQwen3.5-9BmediumLing 3.0 TinyhighvsQwen3.5-9Bmedium