Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Ling 3.0 Tiny (default) vs Qwen3.5-9B (medium)

Qwen3.5-9B (medium) leads on average score with 4.0 vs 3.8. Ling 3.0 Tiny (default) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.106. Ling 3.0 Tiny (default) is faster at 13.39s vs 110.18s, with pass rates of 8.7% vs 26.1%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-26

Compared models

Rank
#413
Total Output Tokens
110,071
Response Time (avg)
13.39s
Total Cost
$0.000
Rank
#408
Total Output Tokens
447,247
Response Time (avg)
110.18s
Total Cost
$0.106
Recommended model Qwen3.5-9B (medium)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (4.0) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric Ling 3.0 Tiny Ling 3.0 Tiny default Release: 2026-08-07 Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.5-9B medium Release: 2026-03-02
Score 3.8 4.0
Rank #413 #408
Reliability 9.8 8.7
Consistency 10.0 7.9
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 8.7% 26.1%
Flaky tests 0 6
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.000 3.523
Total Cost $0.000 $0.106
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 184,579 387,323
Output Tokens 110,071 48,562
Reasoning Tokens 0 410,431
Response Time (avg) 13.39s 110.18s
Response Time (max) 240.61s 569.97s
Response Time (total) 294.48s 1873.00s
Parameters 7.9B total (1.3B active) 9B
Availability Open source Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#413 Ling 3.0 Tiny

default
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
Cost
$0.000
Time
334.1s
Tokens
32,913 tok

#408 Qwen3.5-9B

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
35.9s
Tokens
3,030 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.0 Tiny 4.2 10.0 0.0% 0 1.19s 8,307 798 0
Qwen3.5-9B 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 100.88s 2,396 7,890 41,129

Switch Comparison Pair