Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-1T vs Poolside: Laguna S 2.1

Ling-2.6-1T leads on average score with 5.3 vs 5.0. Ling-2.6-1T has the lower benchmark cost at $0.016 vs $0.091. Ling-2.6-1T is faster at 8.58s vs 85.35s, with pass rates of 18.2% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelLing-2.6-1TIt has the best score here (5.3), while costing about 6.0x less than Laguna S 2.1 (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Ling-2.6-1T Ling-2.6-1T none Release: 2026-04-23 Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 low Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available
Score 5.3 5.0
Rank #170 #181
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 10.0 7.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 18.2% 25.8%
Flaky tests 0 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.277 3.022
Total Cost $0.016 $0.091
Input Price $0.075 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.625 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 106,414 118,746
Output Tokens 11,555 67,823
Reasoning Tokens 0 383,885
Response Time (avg) 8.58s 85.35s
Response Time (max) 25.72s 814.73s
Response Time (total) 163.06s 1877.64s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#170 Ling-2.6-1T

none
Ling-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-1t
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#181 Laguna S 2.1

low
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.6s
Tokens
1,314 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 3.8 10.0 0.0% 0 10.57s 813 381 0
Laguna S 2.1 3.8 7.1 22.2% 1 167.51s 7,917 58,111 119,138

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair