Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

MiniMax: MiniMax M2.7 vs Poolside: Laguna S 2.1

The average score is effectively tied at 5.0 vs 5.0. Laguna S 2.1 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.091 vs $0.163. MiniMax M2.7 (medium) is faster at 41.28s vs 85.35s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelMiniMax M2.7 (medium)It has the best score here (5.0), while responding about 2.1x faster than Laguna S 2.1 (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric MiniMax M2.7 MiniMax M2.7 medium Release: 2026-03-18 Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 low Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available
Score 5.0 5.0
Rank #180 #181
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 6.6 7.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 25.8%
Flaky tests 9 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.906 3.022
Total Cost $0.163 $0.091
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $1.000 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 114,518 118,746
Output Tokens 18,558 67,823
Reasoning Tokens 119,036 383,885
Response Time (avg) 41.28s 85.35s
Response Time (max) 196.21s 814.73s
Response Time (total) 866.81s 1877.64s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#180 MiniMax M2.7

medium
Cost
$0.022
Time
22.8s
Tokens
9,250 tok

#181 Laguna S 2.1

low
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.6s
Tokens
1,314 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M2.7 5.7 9.1 33.3% 0 101.89s 2,961 1,231 38,841
Laguna S 2.1 3.8 7.1 22.2% 1 167.51s 7,917 58,111 119,138

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair