Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

OpenAI: GPT-4o-mini vs Poolside: Laguna S 2.1

Laguna S 2.1 (low) leads on average score with 5.0 vs 5.0. GPT-4o-mini has the lower benchmark cost at $0.010 vs $0.091. GPT-4o-mini is faster at 1.99s vs 85.35s, with pass rates of 22.7% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelGPT-4o-miniIts score stays close to the best score here (5.0 vs 5.0), while costing about 9.3x less than Laguna S 2.1 (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric GPT-4o-mini GPT-4o-mini none Release: 2024-07-18 Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 low Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available
Score 5.0 5.0
Rank #183 #181
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.9 7.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 22.7% 25.8%
Flaky tests 0 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.195 3.022
Total Cost $0.010 $0.091
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 53,136 118,746
Output Tokens 2,911 67,823
Reasoning Tokens 0 383,885
Response Time (avg) 1.99s 85.35s
Response Time (max) 7.58s 814.73s
Response Time (total) 29.86s 1877.64s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#183 GPT-4o-mini

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.6s
Tokens
742 tok

#181 Laguna S 2.1

low
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.6s
Tokens
1,314 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-4o-mini 3.2 9.6 0.0% 0 1.63s 7,314 367 0
Laguna S 2.1 3.8 7.1 22.2% 1 167.51s 7,917 58,111 119,138

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair