Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B

Qwen3.5-9B leads on average score with 5.1 vs 5.0. Qwen3.5-9B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.021 vs $0.091. Qwen3.5-9B is faster at 19.17s vs 85.35s, with pass rates of 25.8% vs 19.7%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5-9BIt has the best score here (5.1), while costing about 4.5x less than Laguna S 2.1 (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 low Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.5-9B none Release: 2026-03-02
Score 5.0 5.1
Rank #181 #177
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 7.8 9.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 25.8% 19.7%
Flaky tests 6 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.022 0.490
Total Cost $0.091 $0.021
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.200 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 118,746 144,407
Output Tokens 67,823 37,484
Reasoning Tokens 383,885 0
Response Time (avg) 85.35s 19.17s
Response Time (max) 814.73s 382.06s
Response Time (total) 1877.64s 421.74s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#181 Laguna S 2.1

low
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.6s
Tokens
1,314 tok

#177 Qwen3.5-9B

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Laguna S 2.1 3.8 7.1 22.2% 1 167.51s 7,917 58,111 119,138
Qwen3.5-9B 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 5.60s 7,913 1,042 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair