Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

MiMo-V2.5 leads on average score with 5.1 vs 5.0. MiMo-V2.5 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.025 vs $0.091. MiMo-V2.5 is faster at 4.62s vs 85.35s, with pass rates of 25.8% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelMiMo-V2.5It has the best score here (5.1), while costing about 3.7x less than Laguna S 2.1 (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 low Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 none Release: 2026-04-22
Score 5.0 5.1
Rank #181 #176
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 7.8 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 25.8% 25.8%
Flaky tests 6 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.022 0.770
Total Cost $0.091 $0.025
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.200 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 118,746 141,043
Output Tokens 67,823 16,464
Reasoning Tokens 383,885 0
Response Time (avg) 85.35s 4.62s
Response Time (max) 814.73s 55.36s
Response Time (total) 1877.64s 101.57s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#181 Laguna S 2.1

low
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.6s
Tokens
1,314 tok

#176 MiMo-V2.5

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
267.4s
Tokens
25,283 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Laguna S 2.1 3.8 7.1 22.2% 1 167.51s 7,917 58,111 119,138
MiMo-V2.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.24s 7,440 696 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair