Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-1T vs Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (medium) leads on average score with 5.6 vs 5.3. Ling-2.6-1T has the lower benchmark cost at $0.016 vs $0.048. KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (medium) is faster at 8.42s vs 8.58s, with pass rates of 18.2% vs 45.5%.

Recommended modelKAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (5.6) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Ling-2.6-1T Ling-2.6-1T none Release: 2026-04-23 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 medium Release: 2026-07-14
Score 5.3 5.6
Rank #158 #145
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 10.0 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 18.2% 45.5%
Flaky tests 0 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.277 0.593
Total Cost $0.016 $0.048
Input Price $0.075 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Output Price $0.625 / 1M $0.600 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 106,414 51,472
Output Tokens 11,555 7,822
Reasoning Tokens 0 58,352
Response Time (avg) 8.58s 8.42s
Response Time (max) 25.72s 48.19s
Response Time (total) 163.06s 185.24s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#158 Ling-2.6-1T

none
Ling-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-1t
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#145 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.003
Time
23.7s
Tokens
4,924 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 3.8 10.0 0.0% 0 10.57s 813 381 0
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 3.6 7.0 22.2% 1 23.37s 7,893 5,199 29,973

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair