Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna

KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (medium) leads on average score with 5.6 vs 5.4. KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.048 vs $0.142. GPT-5.6 Luna is faster at 1.50s vs 8.42s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 34.9%.

Recommended modelKAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (medium)It has the best score here (5.6), while costing about 3.0x less than GPT-5.6 Luna.

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 medium Release: 2026-07-14 GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna none Release: 2026-07-09
Score 5.6 5.4
Rank #142 #152
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 8.9 8.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 34.9%
Flaky tests 3 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.593 2.360
Total Cost $0.048 $0.142
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 51,472 101,323
Output Tokens 7,822 6,709
Reasoning Tokens 58,352 0
Response Time (avg) 8.42s 1.50s
Response Time (max) 48.19s 10.57s
Response Time (total) 185.24s 32.91s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#142 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.003
Time
23.7s
Tokens
4,924 tok

#152 GPT-5.6 Luna

none
Cost
$0.016
Time
15.8s
Tokens
2,685 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 3.6 7.0 22.2% 1 23.37s 7,893 5,199 29,973
GPT-5.6 Luna 3.8 7.2 22.2% 1 980ms 7,302 459 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair