Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-1T vs Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high) leads on average score with 5.6 vs 5.3. Ling-2.6-1T has the lower benchmark cost at $0.016 vs $0.077. Ling-2.6-1T is faster at 8.58s vs 15.90s, with pass rates of 18.2% vs 43.9%.

Recommended modelKAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high)It has the strongest score in this comparison (5.6) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Ling-2.6-1T Ling-2.6-1T none Release: 2026-04-23 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 high Release: 2026-07-14
Score 5.3 5.6
Rank #158 #140
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 10.0 7.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 18.2% 43.9%
Flaky tests 0 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.277 1.097
Total Cost $0.016 $0.077
Input Price $0.075 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Output Price $0.625 / 1M $0.600 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 106,414 50,470
Output Tokens 11,555 3,957
Reasoning Tokens 0 111,374
Response Time (avg) 8.58s 15.90s
Response Time (max) 25.72s 118.35s
Response Time (total) 163.06s 349.71s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#158 Ling-2.6-1T

none
Ling-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-1t
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#140 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 3.8 10.0 0.0% 0 10.57s 813 381 0
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 4.3 7.3 11.1% 1 39.07s 6,948 1,166 55,883

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair