领域专项 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 领域专项 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 测试正确 ↑.
316/316
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 领域专项 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #175 | Dots 3 Note Preview low | Dots Studio | 3.6 | 6.4 | $0.000 | 0/3 | 49.5s |
| #178 | MiMo-V2.5 medium | Xiaomi | 3.6 | 6.4 | $0.104 | 0/3 | 137.7s |
| #179 | Ling-3.0-flash high | Inclusionai | 3.0 | 6.4 | $0.021 | 0/3 | 30.3s |
| #180 | Ring-2.6-1T medium | Inclusionai | 3.6 | 6.4 | $0.102 | 0/3 | 65.3s |
| #183 | Seed-2.0-Lite none | Bytedance Seed | 3.0 | 6.2 | $0.066 | 0/3 | 1.12s |
| #185 | GPT-5.6 Luna low | OpenAI | 2.9 | 6.2 | $0.051 | 0/3 | 11.2s |
| #186 | Claude Sonnet 5 none | Anthropic | 2.9 | 6.1 | $0.548 | 0/3 | 3.32s |
| #187 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite minimal | 2.9 | 6.1 | $0.047 | 0/3 | 972ms | |
| #188 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium | Qwen | 3.5 | 6.1 | $0.675 | 0/3 | 76.4s |
| #189 | gpt-oss-120b medium | OpenAI | 2.9 | 6.1 | $0.020 | 0/3 | 27.6s |
| #191 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite none | 2.9 | 6.1 | $0.046 | 0/3 | 701ms | |
| #192 | Qwen3.5-Flash medium | Qwen | 2.9 | 6.1 | $0.142 | 0/3 | 143.8s |
| #199 | Trinity Large Thinking low | Arcee AI | 2.9 | 6.0 | $0.625 | 0/3 | 140.3s |
| #200 | Gemini 2.5 Flash none | 3.6 | 6.0 | $0.017 | 0/3 | 449ms | |
| #204 | GPT-5 Nano medium | OpenAI | 3.4 | 6.0 | $0.118 | 0/3 | 124.1s |