- Rang
- #114
- Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
- 331,107
- Responstijd (gem.)
- 41.03s
- Totale kosten
- $0.053
Qwen3.7 Flash (low) vs GLM 5.1 (medium)
Qwen3.7 Flash (low) leidt in gemiddelde score met 7.7 vs 7.5. Qwen3.7 Flash (low) heeft lagere benchmarkkosten met $0.053 vs $1.066. Qwen3.7 Flash (low) is sneller met 41.03s vs 66.38s, met slagingspercentages van 68.1% vs 66.7%.
Vergeleken modellen
- Rang
- #119
- Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
- 248,708
- Responstijd (gem.)
- 66.38s
- Totale kosten
- $1.066
Aanbevolen model
Qwen3.7 Flash (low)
Het heeft hier de beste score (7.7) en kost ongeveer 20.3x minder dan GLM 5.1 (medium).
Gedetailleerde vergelijking
| Metriek | Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash low | GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 7.7 | 7.5 |
| Rang | #114 | #119 |
| Betrouwbaarheid | 10.0 | 9.2 |
| Consistentie | 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Pogingen | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Correcte tests | ||
| Slaagpercentage per poging | 68.1% | 66.7% |
| Instabiele tests | 6 | 4 |
| Totaal runs | 69 | 69 |
| Kosten per resultaat | 0.439 | 9.004 |
| Totale kosten | $0.053 | $1.066 |
| Invoerprijs | $0.030 / 1M | $0.965 / 1M |
| Uitvoerprijs | $0.130 / 1M | $3.032 / 1M |
| Totaal aantal invoer-tokens | 318,058 | 331,577 |
| Uitvoer-tokens | 16,035 | 17,919 |
| Redeneer-tokens | 315,072 | 230,789 |
| Responstijd (gem.) | 41.03s | 66.38s |
| Responstijd (max) | 394.54s | 308.75s |
| Responstijd (totaal) | 943.75s | 1460.31s |
| Parameters | ~35B totaal (~3B actief) | 744B totaal (40B actief) |
| Beschikbaarheid | Gesloten broncode | Open-source |
Model generatie-showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#114 Qwen3.7 Flash
low
Reached the allocated time limit (600 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Kosten
- $0.000
- Tijd
- 600.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
#119 GLM 5.1
medium
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Kosten
- $0.000
- Tijd
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Topmodellen op score
Score vs totale kosten
Responstijd (gem.)
Score vs Responstijd (gem.)
Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
Score vs Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
Categorie-uitsplitsing
| Agenttaken | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 106.71s | 225,867 | 1,749 | 25,339 | |
| GLM 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 225.59s | 248,985 | 1,830 | 30,989 |
| Anti-AI-trucs | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 10.29s | 672 | 680 | 14,285 | |
| GLM 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 8.31s | 555 | 401 | 5,122 |
| Programmeren | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 6.7 | 7.8 | 55.6% | 1 | 42.36s | 7,893 | 428 | 56,419 | |
| GLM 5.1 | 4.6 | 3.7 | 44.5% | 2 | 109.63s | 5,702 | 4,871 | 37,826 |
| Gecombineerd | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 6.4 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 217.77s | 64,756 | 11,880 | 131,432 | |
| GLM 5.1 | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 175.93s | 66,926 | 4,761 | 65,248 |
| Gegevensparsering en extractie | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 15.44s | 7,782 | 270 | 12,503 | |
| GLM 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 9.33s | 7,107 | 991 | 4,552 |
| Domeinspecifiek | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 3.6 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 37.60s | 780 | 60 | 38,897 | |
| GLM 5.1 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 113.95s | 458 | 969 | 74,651 |
| Algemene intelligentie | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 4.0 | 9.3 | 0.0% | 0 | 14.37s | 516 | 128 | 5,423 | |
| GLM 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 20.95s | 477 | 2,875 | 2,875 |
| Instructies opvolgen | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 8.5 | 6.8 | 83.3% | 1 | 9.88s | 699 | 99 | 8,147 | |
| GLM 5.1 | 6.4 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 7.47s | 634 | 204 | 1,617 |
| Puzzeloplossing | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 7.3 | 5.2 | 77.8% | 2 | 9.79s | 696 | 382 | 10,763 | |
| GLM 5.1 | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 31.64s | 609 | 935 | 5,730 |
| Toolaanroepen | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 7.66s | 8,193 | 335 | 2,172 | |
| GLM 5.1 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Algemene kennis | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 18.42s | 204 | 24 | 9,692 | |
| GLM 5.1 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 29.40s | 124 | 82 | 2,179 |
Snelle vergelijking
Vergelijkingspaar wisselen
Space Bunny AlphahighvsGLM 5.1mediumMuse Glimmer 30BmediumvsQwen3.7 FlashlowMuse Glimmer 30BhighvsQwen3.7 FlashlowGPT-6 LunahighvsQwen3.7 FlashlowQwen3.8 27BlowGratis beschikbaarvsGLM 5.1mediumGPT-6 LunalowvsGLM 5.1mediumSeed-2.0-CodehighvsGLM 5.1mediumDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731mediumvsQwen3.7 FlashlowQwen3.7 FlashlowvsGrok 4.6mediumQwen3.7 FlashlowvsStep 3.7 FlashmediumDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731lowvsGLM 5.1mediumQwen3.7 FlashlowvsGLM 5.3high