AI BENCHY
Advertise here
#118

Ling-2.6-flash

Inclusionai Release: 2026-04-21 Tested on: 2026-05-08 15:30 inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash::none

Summary

Ling-2.6-flash scores 5.3 on AI BENCHY and ranks #118. It has 10.0 reliability, a 35.1% pass rate, $0.001 total cost, and 9.76s average response time.

What makes Ling-2.6-flash unique: It stands out most in Coding, where it ranks #1, while Puzzle Solving is its weakest area at #16. Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range.

Score

5.3

Consistency

9.2

Reliability

10.0

Total Cost (Current Price)

$0.001

Total Output Tokens

2,878

Total Input Tokens

0

Input Price

$0.080 / 1M

Output Price

$0.240 / 1M

Tests Correct

Wrong Tests: 13

Attempt pass rate: 35.1%

Flaky tests

2

Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).

Response Time (avg)

9.76s

Response Time (max): 35.34s

Response Time (total): 185.37s

Wrong answer: 9 Did not follow instructions: 2 Invalid tool call: 2

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#118 Ling-2.6-flash

none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Run history

Tested on Score Reliability Tests Correct Total Cost Compare
2026-07-16 23:16 New test added 4.9 10.0 $0.002 ↑ Compare
2026-06-04 14:30 New test added 5.0 10.0 $0.001 ↑ Compare
2026-05-22 00:42 Suite changed 5.3 10.0 $0.001 Compare
2026-05-08 15:30 Suite changed 5.3 10.0 $0.001 Current run
2026-04-22 12:55 First recorded run 5.4 N/A $0.000 Compare

This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.

Run comparison

RunScoreConsistencyReliabilityTests CorrectFlaky testsTotal Output TokensTotal Input TokensTotal CostResponse Time (avg)
2026-05-08 15:30 · Suite changed5.39.210.06/1922,8780$0.0019.76s
2026-05-22 00:42 · Suite changed5.39.210.06/1922,8780$0.0019.76s
Difference0.00.00.0-1000$0.0000ms

These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.

Charts

Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Quick Compare

Ling-2.6-flashnonevsGPT-5.6 LunanoneLing-2.6-flashnonevsGemma 4 26B A4BnoneFree AvailableLing-2.6-flashnonevsLaguna XS 2.1noneFree AvailableLing-2.6-flashnonevsKimi K2.5noneLing-2.6-flashnonevsQwen3.6 35B A3BnoneLing-2.6-flashnonevsGemini 3.6 FlashmediumLing-2.6-flashnonevsGemini 3.6 FlashhighLing-2.6-flashnonevsNemotron 3 UltramediumFree AvailableLing-2.6-flashnonevsGPT-5.5low

Category Breakdown

Category Score Consistency Tests Correct
Anti-AI Tricks 6.8 8.1
Coding 10.0 10.0
Combined 3.0 10.0
Data parsing and extraction 6.5 10.0
Domain specific 3.0 10.0
General Intelligence 4.0 10.0
Instructions following 9.8 10.0
Puzzle Solving 2.9 7.2
Tool Calling 3.0 10.0
Trivia 3.0 10.0

Compared models