Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash vs Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

Ling-2.6-flash leads on average score with 4.9 vs 4.8. Ling-2.6-flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.002 vs $0.067. Ling-2.6-flash is faster at 10.68s vs 12.17s, with pass rates of 30.3% vs 37.9%.

Recommended modelLing-2.6-flashIt has the best score here (4.9), while costing about 42.0x less than KAT-Coder-Air V2.5.

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Ling-2.6-flash Ling-2.6-flash none Release: 2026-04-21 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 none Release: 2026-07-14
Score 4.9 4.8
Rank #187 #191
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 6.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 30.3% 37.9%
Flaky tests 2 8
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.024 1.336
Total Cost $0.002 $0.067
Input Price $0.010 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Output Price $0.030 / 1M $0.600 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 114,375 69,367
Output Tokens 14,903 93,913
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 10.68s 12.17s
Response Time (max) 36.03s 121.05s
Response Time (total) 213.51s 267.83s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#187 Ling-2.6-flash

none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#191 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

none
Cost
$0.002
Time
14.5s
Tokens
2,619 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 11.21s 813 381 0
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 3.3 9.6 0.0% 0 14.31s 6,472 16,918 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair