- Rank
- #271
- Total Output Tokens
- 14,903
- Response Time (avg)
- 10.71s
- Total Cost
- $0.002
Ling-2.6-flash vs Ring-2.6-1T
The average score is effectively tied at 4.9 vs 4.8. Ling-2.6-flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.002 vs $0.026. Ling-2.6-flash is faster at 10.71s vs 51.99s, with pass rates of 30.3% vs 45.5%.
- Rank
- #274
- Total Output Tokens
- 40,277
- Response Time (avg)
- 51.99s
- Total Cost
- $0.026
Recommended model
Ling-2.6-flash
It has the best score here (4.9), while costing about 16.2x less than Ring-2.6-1T.
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Ling-2.6-flash Ling-2.6-flash none | Ring-2.6-1T Ring-2.6-1T none |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.9 | 4.8 |
| Rank | #271 | #274 |
| Reliability | 9.6 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 9.3 | 9.3 |
| Attempts | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 30.3% | 45.5% |
| Flaky tests | 2 | 2 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 0.024 | 0.037 |
| Total Cost | $0.002 | $0.026 |
| Input Price | $0.010 / 1M | $0.075 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.030 / 1M | $0.625 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 114,384 | 7,608 |
| Output Tokens | 14,903 | 40,277 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 0 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 10.71s | 51.99s |
| Response Time (max) | 36.03s | 143.82s |
| Response Time (total) | 214.28s | 831.90s |
| Parameters | 104B total (7.4B active) | 1T total (63B active) |
| Availability | Open source | Open source |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#271 Ling-2.6-flash
none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
#274 Ring-2.6-1T
none
Ring-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ring-2.6-1t
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 6.8 | 8.1 | 58.3% | 1 | 11.81s | 726 | 573 | 0 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 9.2 | 8.4 | 91.7% | 1 | 43.33s | 810 | 5,575 | 0 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 11.21s | 813 | 381 | 0 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 143.82s | 834 | 5,036 | 0 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 35.69s | 94,475 | 13,094 | 0 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 8.48s | 8,004 | 246 | 0 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 45.87s | 2,712 | 1,529 | 0 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 5.20s | 819 | 24 | 0 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 56.85s | 882 | 18,051 | 0 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 4.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.45s | 540 | 109 | 0 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 4.3 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 15.63s | 561 | 846 | 0 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.52s | 732 | 81 | 0 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 27.36s | 774 | 2,004 | 0 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 6.51s | 729 | 151 | 0 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 31.47s | 792 | 3,469 | 0 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 18.80s | 7,324 | 229 | 0 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.06s | 222 | 15 | 0 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 133.60s | 243 | 3,767 | 0 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Ring-2.6-1TnonevsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailableTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsRing-2.6-1TnoneLing-2.6-flashnonevsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailableTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsLing-2.6-flashnoneLing-2.6-flashnonevsLaguna S 2.1lowFree AvailableCobuddymediumvsRing-2.6-1TnoneMercury 2.5 PreviewlowvsLing-2.6-flashnoneLing-2.6-flashnonevsMiniMax M2.7mediumRing-2.6-1TnonevsLaguna S 2.1lowFree AvailableCobuddymediumvsLing-2.6-flashnoneMercury 2.5 PreviewlowvsRing-2.6-1TnoneRing-2.6-1TnonevsMiniMax M2.7medium