Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Trinity Large Preview vs inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash

Ling-2.6-flash leads on average score with 4.9 vs 4.8. Ling-2.6-flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.002 vs $0.008. Trinity Large Preview is faster at 2.98s vs 10.68s, with pass rates of 21.2% vs 30.3%.

Recommended modelTrinity Large PreviewIts score stays close to the best score here (4.8 vs 4.9), while responding about 3.6x faster than Ling-2.6-flash.

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Trinity Large Preview Trinity Large Preview none Release: 2026-01-27 Ling-2.6-flash Ling-2.6-flash none Release: 2026-04-21
Score 4.8 4.9
Rank #192 #187
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 21.2% 30.3%
Flaky tests 2 2
Total Runs 63 66
Cost per result 0.017 0.024
Total Cost $0.008 $0.002
Input Price $0.243 / 1M $0.010 / 1M
Output Price $0.243 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 29,828 114,375
Output Tokens 2,169 14,903
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 2.98s 10.68s
Response Time (max) 14.34s 36.03s
Response Time (total) 56.57s 213.51s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#192 Trinity Large Preview

none
No endpoints found for arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#187 Ling-2.6-flash

none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Trinity Large Preview 3.7 7.7 11.1% 1 14.34s 738 397 0
Ling-2.6-flash 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 11.21s 813 381 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair