- Peringkat
- #81
- Total token output
- 648,854
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 88.74s
- Total Biaya
- $0.000
Ling 3.1 Flash (medium) vs GLM 5.2 (medium)
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 8.3 vs 8.2. Ling 3.1 Flash (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.000 vs $0.417. GLM 5.2 (medium) lebih cepat di 26.88s vs 88.74s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 71.0% vs 81.2%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #84
- Total token output
- 81,020
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 26.88s
- Total Biaya
- $0.417
Model yang direkomendasikan
GLM 5.2 (medium)
It has the best score here (8.2), while responding about 3.3x faster than Ling 3.1 Flash (medium).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash medium | GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Peringkat | #81 | #84 |
| Keandalan | 9.6 | 9.6 |
| Konsistensi | 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Percobaan | 69/69 | 66/69 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 71.0% | 81.2% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 3 | 4 |
| Total Run | 69 | 66 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.000 | 2.890 |
| Total Biaya | $0.000 | $0.417 |
| Harga input | $0.000 / 1M | $0.410 / 1M |
| Harga output | $0.000 / 1M | $3.990 / 1M |
| Harga baca cache | T/A | $0.260 / 1M |
| Harga tulis cache | T/A | T/A |
| Total token input | 369,495 | 227,164 |
| Token output | 172,852 | 20,029 |
| Token penalaran | 476,002 | 60,991 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 88.74s | 26.88s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 567.88s | 102.40s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 2041.10s | 591.34s |
| Parameter | 560B total (25B aktif) | 744B total (40B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Sumber terbuka |
Harga cache berlaku untuk token input. Pembacaan memakai kembali prompt tersimpan; penulisan menyimpannya dan dapat menambah biaya. Token output menggunakan harga output.
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#81 Ling 3.1 Flash
medium- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 101.1s
- Token
- 11,607 tok
#84 GLM 5.2
medium- Biaya
- $0.041
- Waktu
- 195.8s
- Token
- 9,287 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Tugas agen | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 100.10s | 233,792 | 12,506 | 12,249 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 102.40s | 189,965 | 7,768 | 11,491 |
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.24s | 750 | 1,152 | 3,396 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.89s | 639 | 497 | 2,634 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 87.15s | 8,298 | 19,577 | 62,002 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 40.96s | 7,317 | 1,475 | 17,123 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 6.6 | 9.1 | 50.0% | 0 | 306.46s | 106,402 | 26,806 | 100,471 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 51.96s | 12,696 | 458 | 4,531 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 20.92s | 8,016 | 1,334 | 3,754 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 13.44s | 7,149 | 348 | 2,345 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 262.25s | 837 | 100,307 | 228,869 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 4.1 | 4.4 | 44.5% | 2 | 45.47s | 551 | 8,188 | 11,606 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 5.3 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 7.28s | 546 | 152 | 1,820 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 17.39s | 498 | 54 | 1,842 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.57s | 744 | 323 | 1,317 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 9.9 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 7.90s | 678 | 94 | 1,518 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 42.32s | 747 | 5,455 | 40,080 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 13.13s | 672 | 536 | 4,822 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 2.8 | 2.1 | 33.3% | 1 | 47.17s | 9,135 | 3,850 | 12,018 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 20.41s | 6,861 | 230 | 550 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 32.55s | 228 | 1,390 | 10,026 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 34.25s | 138 | 381 | 2,529 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Grok 4.5highvsGLM 5.2mediumLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsGrok 4.5highLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsKimi K3maxGemini 3.5 FlashhighvsLing 3.1 FlashmediumKimi K3maxvsGLM 5.2mediumLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsGPT-5.6 TerrahighGemini 3.5 FlashhighvsGLM 5.2mediumGPT-5.6 TerrahighvsGLM 5.2mediumSeed-2.0-CodelowvsGLM 5.2mediumLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsGLM 5.2highDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731highvsLing 3.1 FlashmediumSeed-2.0-CodelowvsLing 3.1 Flashmedium