- Peringkat
- #80
- Total token output
- 105,640
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 10.41s
- Total Biaya
- $0.088
Claude Haiku 5.5 (high) vs Ling 3.1 Flash (medium)
Claude Haiku 5.5 (high) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 8.3 vs 8.3. Ling 3.1 Flash (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.000 vs $0.088. Claude Haiku 5.5 (high) lebih cepat di 10.41s vs 88.74s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 76.8% vs 71.0%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #85
- Total token output
- 571,666
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 88.74s
- Total Biaya
- $0.000
Model yang direkomendasikan
Claude Haiku 5.5 (high)
It has the best score here (8.3), while responding about 8.5x faster than Ling 3.1 Flash (medium).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Claude Haiku 5.5 Claude Haiku 5.5 high | Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Peringkat | #80 | #85 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 9.6 |
| Konsistensi | 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Percobaan | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 76.8% | 71.0% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 4 | 3 |
| Total Run | 69 | 69 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.584 | 0.000 |
| Total Biaya | $0.088 | $0.000 |
| Harga input | $0.100 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Harga output | $0.500 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Harga baca cache | $0.010 / 1M | T/A |
| Harga tulis cache | $0.125 / 1M | T/A |
| Total token input | 346,451 | 369,495 |
| Token output | 10,136 | 172,852 |
| Token penalaran | 95,504 | 476,002 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 10.41s | 88.74s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 52.61s | 567.88s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 239.38s | 2041.10s |
| Parameter | ~50B | 560B total (25B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Tertutup |
Harga cache berlaku untuk token input. Pembacaan memakai kembali prompt tersimpan; penulisan menyimpannya dan dapat menambah biaya. Token output menggunakan harga output.
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#80 Claude Haiku 5.5
high- Biaya
- $0.003
- Waktu
- 28.0s
- Token
- 5,775 tok
#85 Ling 3.1 Flash
medium- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 101.1s
- Token
- 11,607 tok
Rincian Kategori
| Tugas agen | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 52.61s | 206,189 | 2,382 | 10,134 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 100.10s | 233,792 | 12,506 | 12,249 |
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.70s | 858 | 551 | 2,399 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.24s | 750 | 1,152 | 3,396 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 6.0 | 7.2 | 55.6% | 1 | 9.54s | 10,608 | 503 | 16,741 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 87.15s | 8,298 | 19,577 | 62,002 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 30.00s | 102,723 | 4,896 | 29,883 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 6.6 | 9.1 | 50.0% | 0 | 306.46s | 106,402 | 26,806 | 100,471 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.77s | 10,515 | 312 | 2,031 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 20.92s | 8,016 | 1,334 | 3,754 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 4.1 | 4.4 | 44.5% | 2 | 16.29s | 990 | 65 | 25,349 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 262.25s | 837 | 100,307 | 228,869 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.89s | 714 | 208 | 1,603 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 5.3 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 7.28s | 546 | 152 | 1,820 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 9.9 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.19s | 921 | 99 | 1,723 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.57s | 744 | 323 | 1,317 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 5.9 | 7.2 | 55.6% | 1 | 3.28s | 912 | 615 | 3,202 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 42.32s | 747 | 5,455 | 40,080 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.34s | 11,757 | 354 | 849 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 2.8 | 2.1 | 33.3% | 1 | 47.17s | 9,135 | 3,850 | 12,018 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 4.49s | 264 | 151 | 1,590 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 32.55s | 228 | 1,390 | 10,026 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Ling 3.1 FlashmediumvsGrok 4.5highClaude Haiku 5.5highvsKimi K3maxLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsKimi K3maxClaude Haiku 5.5highvsGPT-6 LunamediumGemini 3.5 FlashhighvsLing 3.1 FlashmediumClaude Haiku 5.5highvsQwen3.7 PlusmediumLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsGPT-5.6 TerrahighClaude Haiku 5.5highvsGLM 5.2mediumClaude Haiku 5.5highvsGPT-5.6 TerramediumClaude Haiku 5.5highvsGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewmediumLing 3.1 FlashmediumvsGLM 5.2highClaude Haiku 5.5highvsMuse Glimmer 30Bxhigh