- Peringkat
- #82
- Total token output
- 333,632
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 72.50s
- Total Biaya
- $2.571
Grok 4.5 (high) vs GLM 5.2 (medium)
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 8.2 vs 8.2. GLM 5.2 (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.398 vs $2.571. GLM 5.2 (medium) lebih cepat di 26.88s vs 72.50s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 82.6% vs 81.2%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #83
- Total token output
- 81,020
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 26.88s
- Total Biaya
- $0.398
Model yang direkomendasikan
GLM 5.2 (medium)
It has the best score here (8.2), while costing about 6.5x less than Grok 4.5 (high).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Grok 4.5 Grok 4.5 high | GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Peringkat | #82 | #83 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 9.6 |
| Konsistensi | 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Percobaan | 69/69 | 66/69 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 82.6% | 81.2% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 3 | 4 |
| Total Run | 69 | 66 |
| Biaya per hasil | 15.123 | 2.890 |
| Total Biaya | $2.571 | $0.398 |
| Harga input | $2.000 / 1M | $0.325 / 1M |
| Harga output | $6.000 / 1M | $3.990 / 1M |
| Total token input | 342,124 | 227,164 |
| Token output | 7,135 | 20,029 |
| Token penalaran | 326,497 | 60,991 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 72.50s | 26.88s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 676.83s | 102.40s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 1667.51s | 591.34s |
| Parameter | ~1.7T total (~170B aktif) | 744B total (40B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Sumber terbuka |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#82 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.5
high- Biaya
- $0.015
- Waktu
- 29.7s
- Token
- 2,737 tok
#83 GLM 5.2
medium- Biaya
- $0.041
- Waktu
- 195.8s
- Token
- 9,287 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Qwen3.7 PlusmediumvsGrok 4.5highGPT-5.6 TerramediumvsGrok 4.5highClaude Opus 4.8mediumvsGrok 4.5highGPT-6 LunamediumvsGrok 4.5highKimi K3maxvsGrok 4.5highKimi K3maxvsGLM 5.2mediumSeed-2.0-LitemediumvsGrok 4.5highGemini 3.5 FlashhighvsGLM 5.2mediumGPT-5.6 TerrahighvsGLM 5.2mediumSeed-2.0-CodelowvsGLM 5.2mediumSeed-2.0-CodelowvsGrok 4.5highDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731highvsGLM 5.2medium