#120 Gemma 4 31B
none- Biaya
- $0.001
- Waktu
- 12.8s
- Token
- 795 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5
Ringkasan
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 6.2 vs 6.1. Gemma 4 31B memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.002 vs $0.045. Gemma 4 31B lebih cepat di 4.05s vs 8.28s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 47.6% vs 47.6%.
Model yang direkomendasikanGemma 4 31BIts score stays close to the best score here (6.1 vs 6.2), while costing about 25.7x less than KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (medium).
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B none Tersedia gratis | KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 6.1 | 6.2 |
| Peringkat | #120 | #115 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 9.7 |
| Konsistensi | 10.0 | 8.8 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 47.6% | 47.6% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 0 | 3 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.034 | 0.562 |
| Total Biaya | $0.002 | $0.045 |
| Harga input | $0.060 / 1M | $0.150 / 1M |
| Harga output | $0.350 / 1M | $0.600 / 1M |
| Total token input | 20,911 | 42,750 |
| Token output | 1,407 | 7,759 |
| Token penalaran | 0 | 56,357 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 4.05s | 8.28s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 26.13s | 48.19s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 76.87s | 173.80s |
Showcase generasi
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#115 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5
medium- Biaya
- $0.003
- Waktu
- 23.7s
- Token
- 4,924 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 31B | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 11.19s | 8,381 | 735 | 0 | |
| KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 | 3.6 | 7.0 | 22.2% | 1 | 23.37s | 7,893 | 5,199 | 29,973 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Gemini 2.5 FlashnonevsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5mediumGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5mediumGemini 3.1 Flash LitenonevsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5mediumKAT-Coder-Air V2.5mediumvsGPT-5.6 LunalowSeed-2.0-LitenonevsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5mediumKAT-Coder-Air V2.5mediumvsQwen3.5-FlashnoneGemma 4 31BnoneTersedia gratisvsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5lowKAT-Coder-Air V2.5mediumvsNemotron 3 Ultra 550b A55bnoneTersedia gratisGemma 4 31BnoneTersedia gratisvsGPT-5.6 LunalowKAT-Coder-Air V2.5mediumvsGPT-5.5noneGemma 4 31BnoneTersedia gratisvsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5highKAT-Coder-Air V2.5mediumvsQwen3.6 Max Previewnone