#115 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5
medium- Biaya
- $0.003
- Waktu
- 23.7s
- Token
- 4,924 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna
Ringkasan
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 6.2 vs 6.2. KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.045 vs $0.141. GPT-5.6 Luna (low) lebih cepat di 4.35s vs 8.28s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 47.6% vs 57.1%.
Model yang direkomendasikanKAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (medium)It has the best score here (6.2), while costing about 3.1x less than GPT-5.6 Luna (low).
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 medium | GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna low |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 6.2 | 6.2 |
| Peringkat | #115 | #113 |
| Keandalan | 9.7 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 47.6% | 57.1% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 3 | 4 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.562 | 1.404 |
| Total Biaya | $0.045 | $0.141 |
| Harga input | $0.150 / 1M | $1.000 / 1M |
| Harga output | $0.600 / 1M | $6.000 / 1M |
| Total token input | 42,750 | 34,218 |
| Token output | 7,759 | 2,110 |
| Token penalaran | 56,357 | 15,571 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 8.28s | 4.35s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 48.19s | 18.06s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 173.80s | 91.45s |
Showcase generasi
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#113 GPT-5.6 Luna
low- Biaya
- $0.011
- Waktu
- 10.2s
- Token
- 1,897 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 | 3.6 | 7.0 | 22.2% | 1 | 23.37s | 7,893 | 5,199 | 29,973 | |
| GPT-5.6 Luna | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 4.61s | 7,302 | 557 | 3,535 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Seed-2.0-LitenonevsGPT-5.6 LunalowGemini 2.5 FlashnonevsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5mediumGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5mediumKAT-Coder-Air V2.5highvsGPT-5.6 LunalowGemini 2.5 FlashnonevsGPT-5.6 LunalowGemini 3.1 Flash LitenonevsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5mediumSeed-2.0-LitenonevsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5mediumKAT-Coder-Air V2.5mediumvsQwen3.5-FlashnoneGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsGPT-5.6 LunalowGemma 4 31BnoneTersedia gratisvsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5mediumGemini 3.1 Flash LitenonevsGPT-5.6 LunalowKAT-Coder-Air V2.5mediumvsNemotron 3 Ultra 550b A55bnoneTersedia gratis