#116 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
minimal- Biaya
- $0.001
- Waktu
- 3.7s
- Token
- 635 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Ringkasan
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 6.1 vs 6.2. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.013 vs $0.045. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal) lebih cepat di 1.33s vs 8.28s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 54.0% vs 47.6%.
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite minimal | KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 6.1 | 6.2 |
| Peringkat | #116 | #115 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 9.7 |
| Konsistensi | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 54.0% | 47.6% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 3 | 3 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.130 | 0.562 |
| Total Biaya | $0.013 | $0.045 |
| Harga input | $0.250 / 1M | $0.150 / 1M |
| Harga output | $1.500 / 1M | $0.600 / 1M |
| Total token input | 36,973 | 42,750 |
| Token output | 2,487 | 7,759 |
| Token penalaran | 0 | 56,357 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 1.33s | 8.28s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 4.49s | 48.19s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 27.91s | 173.80s |
Showcase generasi
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 831ms | 8,126 | 666 | 0 | |
| KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 | 3.6 | 7.0 | 22.2% | 1 | 23.37s | 7,893 | 5,199 | 29,973 |
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan