- Peringkat
- #188
- Total token output
- 14,744
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 4.37s
- Total Biaya
- $0.066
Seed-2.0-Lite vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal)
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 6.2 vs 6.1. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.047 vs $0.066. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal) lebih cepat di 1.85s vs 4.37s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 40.9% vs 51.5%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #192
- Total token output
- 11,118
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 1.85s
- Total Biaya
- $0.047
Model yang direkomendasikan
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal)
It has the best score here (6.1), while responding about 2.4x faster than Seed-2.0-Lite.
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite none | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite minimal |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 6.2 | 6.1 |
| Peringkat | #188 | #192 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Percobaan | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 40.9% | 51.5% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 3 | 3 |
| Total Run | 66 | 66 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.813 | 0.465 |
| Total Biaya | $0.066 | $0.047 |
| Harga input | $0.250 / 1M | $0.250 / 1M |
| Harga output | $2.000 / 1M | $1.500 / 1M |
| Total token input | 142,206 | 119,076 |
| Token output | 14,744 | 11,118 |
| Token penalaran | 0 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 4.37s | 1.85s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 44.58s | 12.97s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 96.20s | 40.74s |
| Parameter | ~200B total (~20B aktif) | ~150B total (~10B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Tertutup |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#188 Seed-2.0-Lite
none- Biaya
- $0.005
- Waktu
- 83.8s
- Token
- 2,311 tok
#192 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
minimal- Biaya
- $0.001
- Waktu
- 3.7s
- Token
- 635 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Lite | 3.0 | 5.9 | 16.7% | 2 | 2.43s | 894 | 709 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 8.3 | 10.0 | 75.0% | 0 | 1.10s | 500 | 639 | 0 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Lite | 5.6 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 2.83s | 8,215 | 410 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 831ms | 8,126 | 666 | 0 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Lite | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 25.58s | 111,839 | 11,985 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 7.75s | 94,962 | 8,988 | 0 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.82s | 8,538 | 246 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.04s | 7,552 | 279 | 0 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Lite | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.12s | 948 | 15 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 972ms | 652 | 15 | 0 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.45s | 570 | 294 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 4.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 791ms | 490 | 63 | 0 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.06s | 810 | 73 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 932ms | 615 | 72 | 0 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Lite | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 2.78s | 858 | 709 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 6.0 | 4.6 | 66.7% | 2 | 2.15s | 564 | 153 | 0 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.94s | 9,270 | 292 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.51s | 5,457 | 234 | 0 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Lite | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.96s | 264 | 11 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 724ms | 158 | 9 | 0 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Seed-2.0-LitenonevsGemma 4 31BmediumTersedia gratisSeed-2.0-LitenonevsGPT-5.6 LunalowClaude Sonnet 5nonevsGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumGemini 3.1 Flash Liteminimalvsgpt-oss-120bmediumGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsQwen3.7 FlashnoneGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsGPT-5.6 LunalowGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsQwen3.5-FlashmediumGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsInklinglowTrinity Large ThinkingmediumvsGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsQwen3.6 FlashnoneSeed-2.0-LitenonevsQwen3.5-35B-A3Bmedium