#115 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5
medium- Biaya
- $0.003
- Waktu
- 23.7s
- Token
- 4,924 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Ringkasan
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 6.2 vs 6.1. Qwen3.5-Flash memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.005 vs $0.045. Qwen3.5-Flash lebih cepat di 3.58s vs 8.28s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 47.6% vs 39.7%.
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 medium | Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash none |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 6.2 | 6.1 |
| Peringkat | #115 | #119 |
| Keandalan | 9.7 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 47.6% | 39.7% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 3 | 1 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.562 | 0.075 |
| Total Biaya | $0.045 | $0.005 |
| Harga input | $0.150 / 1M | $0.065 / 1M |
| Harga output | $0.600 / 1M | $0.260 / 1M |
| Total token input | 42,750 | 46,439 |
| Token output | 7,759 | 4,276 |
| Token penalaran | 56,357 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 8.28s | 3.58s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 48.19s | 27.18s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 173.80s | 75.28s |
Showcase generasi
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 | 3.6 | 7.0 | 22.2% | 1 | 23.37s | 7,893 | 5,199 | 29,973 | |
| Qwen3.5-Flash | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 850ms | 7,913 | 519 | 0 |
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan