#124 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5
low- Biaya
- $0.004
- Waktu
- 29.9s
- Token
- 6,008 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Ringkasan
Qwen3.5-Flash unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 6.1 vs 6.0. Qwen3.5-Flash memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.005 vs $0.030. Qwen3.5-Flash lebih cepat di 3.58s vs 6.47s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 46.0% vs 39.7%.
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 low | Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash none |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 6.0 | 6.1 |
| Peringkat | #124 | #119 |
| Keandalan | 9.7 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 7.6 | 9.7 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 46.0% | 39.7% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 6 | 1 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.427 | 0.075 |
| Total Biaya | $0.030 | $0.005 |
| Harga input | $0.150 / 1M | $0.065 / 1M |
| Harga output | $0.600 / 1M | $0.260 / 1M |
| Total token input | 42,464 | 46,439 |
| Token output | 4,227 | 4,276 |
| Token penalaran | 34,864 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 6.47s | 3.58s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 25.49s | 27.18s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 135.80s | 75.28s |
Showcase generasi
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 | 3.5 | 7.3 | 11.1% | 1 | 11.06s | 7,893 | 2,001 | 13,623 | |
| Qwen3.5-Flash | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 850ms | 7,913 | 519 | 0 |
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan