#100 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
low- Biaya
- $0.002
- Waktu
- 3.7s
- Token
- 1,203 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Ringkasan
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (low) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 6.5 vs 6.2. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (low) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.026 vs $0.045. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (low) lebih cepat di 2.77s vs 8.28s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 61.9% vs 47.6%.
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low | KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 6.5 | 6.2 |
| Peringkat | #100 | #115 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 9.7 |
| Konsistensi | 10.0 | 8.8 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 61.9% | 47.6% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 0 | 3 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.196 | 0.562 |
| Total Biaya | $0.026 | $0.045 |
| Harga input | $0.250 / 1M | $0.150 / 1M |
| Harga output | $1.500 / 1M | $0.600 / 1M |
| Total token input | 32,715 | 42,750 |
| Token output | 2,286 | 7,759 |
| Token penalaran | 9,166 | 56,357 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 2.77s | 8.28s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 11.91s | 48.19s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 58.12s | 173.80s |
Showcase generasi
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 1.39s | 8,138 | 660 | 1,060 | |
| KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 | 3.6 | 7.0 | 22.2% | 1 | 23.37s | 7,893 | 5,199 | 29,973 |
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan