- Peringkat
- #180
- Total token output
- 1,890
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 6.19s
- Total Biaya
- $0.017
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen3.5-Flash (medium)
Qwen3.5-Flash (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 6.1 vs 6.0. Gemini 2.5 Flash memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.017 vs $0.142. Gemini 2.5 Flash lebih cepat di 6.19s vs 84.44s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 39.4% vs 65.2%.
- Peringkat
- #172
- Total token output
- 512,846
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 84.44s
- Total Biaya
- $0.142
Model yang direkomendasikan
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Its score stays close to the best score here (6.0 vs 6.1), while costing about 8.5x less than Qwen3.5-Flash (medium).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash none | Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 6.0 | 6.1 |
| Peringkat | #180 | #172 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 9.6 | 7.8 |
| Percobaan | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 39.4% | 65.2% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 1 | 6 |
| Total Run | 66 | 66 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.209 | 1.491 |
| Total Biaya | $0.017 | $0.142 |
| Harga input | $0.300 / 1M | $0.065 / 1M |
| Harga output | $2.500 / 1M | $0.260 / 1M |
| Total token input | 39,886 | 118,508 |
| Token output | 1,890 | 35,457 |
| Token penalaran | 0 | 477,389 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 6.19s | 84.44s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 118.00s | 515.38s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 136.23s | 1773.20s |
| Parameter | ~350B total (~20B aktif) | ~35B total (~3B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Tertutup |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#180 Gemini 2.5 Flash
none
SVG tidak valid
- Biaya
- $0.164
- Waktu
- 215.5s
- Token
- 65,659 tok
#172 Qwen3.5-Flash
medium- Biaya
- $0.002
- Waktu
- 25.8s
- Token
- 4,294 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 582ms | 492 | 102 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.5-Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 59.11s | 672 | 383 | 32,992 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 736ms | 8,122 | 483 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.5-Flash | 3.7 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 58.87s | 6,685 | 302 | 90,081 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 61.19s | 16,470 | 486 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.5-Flash | 6.4 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 266.58s | 94,507 | 10,679 | 204,282 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 652ms | 7,257 | 279 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.5-Flash | 7.3 | 5.9 | 83.3% | 1 | 56.99s | 6,061 | 235 | 16,237 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 3.6 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 449ms | 642 | 12 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.5-Flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 143.82s | 590 | 23,231 | 30,394 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 615ms | 486 | 78 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.5-Flash | 6.1 | 3.1 | 66.7% | 1 | 40.05s | 516 | 99 | 38,486 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 590ms | 615 | 72 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.5-Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 63.49s | 699 | 98 | 14,139 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 604ms | 558 | 132 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.5-Flash | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 27.61s | 381 | 89 | 12,457 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.91s | 5,088 | 234 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.5-Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 10.33s | 8,193 | 309 | 1,284 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.15s | 156 | 12 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.5-Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 48.98s | 204 | 32 | 37,037 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Qwen3.5-FlashmediumvsInklinglowGemini 3.1 Flash LitenonevsQwen3.5-FlashmediumTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsGemini 2.5 FlashnoneGemma 4 31BnoneTersedia gratisvsQwen3.5-FlashmediumGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsQwen3.5-FlashmediumClaude Sonnet 5nonevsQwen3.5-FlashmediumNemotron 3 UltranoneTersedia gratisvsQwen3.5-FlashmediumGPT-5.6 LunalowvsQwen3.5-FlashmediumSeed-2.0-LitenonevsQwen3.5-FlashmediumGemini 2.5 FlashnonevsGPT-5 NanomediumTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsQwen3.5-FlashmediumTrinity Large ThinkingmediumvsGemini 2.5 Flashnone