Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 6.2 vs 6.2. Qwen3.5-Flash (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.139 vs $0.249. GPT-5.6 Luna (low) lebih cepat di 5.04s vs 84.82s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 56.1% vs 69.7%.

Model yang direkomendasikanGPT-5.6 Luna (low)It has the best score here (6.2), while responding about 16.8x faster than Qwen3.5-Flash (medium).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-17

Metrik GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna low Rilis: 2026-07-09 Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash medium Rilis: 2026-02-24
Skor 6.2 6.2
Peringkat #111 #108
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 8.2 7.8
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 56.1% 69.7%
Tes tidak stabil 5 6
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 2.490 1.361
Total Biaya $0.249 $0.139
Harga input $1.000 / 1M $0.065 / 1M
Harga output $6.000 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Total token input 96,346 118,499
Token output 8,211 12,284
Token penalaran 17,227 490,610
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 5.04s 84.82s
Waktu respons (maks) 19.44s 515.38s
Waktu respons (total) 110.88s 1781.22s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#111 GPT-5.6 Luna

low
Biaya
$0.011
Waktu
10.2s
Token
1,897 tok

#108 Qwen3.5-Flash

medium
Biaya
$0.002
Waktu
25.8s
Token
4,294 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
GPT-5.6 Luna 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.61s 7,302 557 3,535
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 58.87s 6,685 302 90,081

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan