Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 6.3 vs 6.2. Qwen3.5-Flash (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.139 vs $0.548. Claude Sonnet 5 lebih cepat di 6.04s vs 84.82s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 45.5% vs 69.7%.

Model yang direkomendasikanClaude Sonnet 5It has the best score here (6.3), while responding about 14.0x faster than Qwen3.5-Flash (medium).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-17

Metrik Claude Sonnet 5 Claude Sonnet 5 none Rilis: 2026-06-30 Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash medium Rilis: 2026-02-24
Skor 6.3 6.2
Peringkat #106 #108
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 8.7 7.8
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 45.5% 69.7%
Tes tidak stabil 4 6
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 6.840 1.361
Total Biaya $0.548 $0.139
Harga input $2.000 / 1M $0.065 / 1M
Harga output $10.000 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Total token input 161,035 118,499
Token output 22,511 12,284
Token penalaran 0 490,610
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 6.04s 84.82s
Waktu respons (maks) 33.39s 515.38s
Waktu respons (total) 132.85s 1781.22s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#106 Claude Sonnet 5

none
Biaya
$0.061
Waktu
53.7s
Token
6,172 tok

#108 Qwen3.5-Flash

medium
Biaya
$0.002
Waktu
25.8s
Token
4,294 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Claude Sonnet 5 4.6 7.9 22.2% 1 3.67s 10,590 1,864 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 58.87s 6,685 302 90,081

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan