Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Trinity Large Thinking (medium) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash

Trinity Large Thinking (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 6.1 vs 6.0. Gemini 2.5 Flash memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.017 vs $0.798. Gemini 2.5 Flash lebih cepat di 6.19s vs 85.44s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 48.5% vs 39.4%.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-08-14

Peringkat
#169
Total token output
1,016,785
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
85.44s
Total Biaya
$0.798
Peringkat
#175
Total token output
1,890
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
6.19s
Total Biaya
$0.017
Model yang direkomendasikan Gemini 2.5 Flash

Its score stays close to the best score here (6.0 vs 6.1), while costing about 47.8x less than Trinity Large Thinking (medium).

Perbandingan terperinci

Metrik Trinity Large Thinking Trinity Large Thinking medium Rilis: 2026-07-28 Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash none Rilis: 2025-06-17
Skor 6.1 6.0
Peringkat #169 #175
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 7.9 9.6
Percobaan 66/66 66/66
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 48.5% 39.4%
Tes tidak stabil 6 1
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 9.972 0.209
Total Biaya $0.798 $0.017
Harga input $0.220 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Harga output $0.850 / 1M $2.500 / 1M
Total token input 118,486 39,886
Token output 156,166 1,890
Token penalaran 860,619 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 85.44s 6.19s
Waktu respons (maks) 525.14s 118.00s
Waktu respons (total) 1879.75s 136.23s
Parameter 398B total (13B aktif) ~350B total (~20B aktif)
Ketersediaan Bobot tersedia Tertutup

Showcase generasi model

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#169 Trinity Large Thinking

medium
Biaya
$0.016
Waktu
75.9s
Token
19,401 tok

#175 Gemini 2.5 Flash

none
SVG tidak valid
Biaya
$0.164
Waktu
215.5s
Token
65,659 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Trinity Large Thinking 7.5 10.0 66.7% 0 179.02s 7,248 7,413 351,155
Gemini 2.5 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 736ms 8,122 483 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan