#39 Qwen3.6 Flash
medium
Invalid SVG
- Cost
- $0.008
- Time
- 29.9s
- Tokens
- 6,784 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Summary
Qwen3.6 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro benchmark comparison: The average score is effectively tied at 7.5 vs 7.5. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the lower benchmark cost at $0.106 vs $0.288. Qwen3.6 Flash is faster at 19.25s vs 26.13s, with pass rates of 71.4% vs 68.3%.
Recommended model: MiMo-V2.5-Pro - It has the best score here (7.5), while costing about 2.7x less than Qwen3.6 Flash.
Last updated at: 2026-06-04
| Metric | Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash medium | MiMo-V2.5-Pro MiMo-V2.5-Pro medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| Rank | #39 | #43 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 71.4% | 68.3% |
| Flaky tests | 5 | 4 |
| Total Runs | 63 | 63 |
| Cost per result | 3.030 | 2.541 |
| Total Cost | $0.288 | $0.106 |
| Input Price | $0.188 / 1M | $0.435 / 1M |
| Output Price | $1.125 / 1M | $0.870 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 42,362 | 40,854 |
| Output Tokens | 2,995 | 5,015 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 245,358 | 97,742 |
| Response Time (avg) | 19.25s | 26.13s |
| Response Time (max) | 122.87s | 130.77s |
| Response Time (total) | 404.20s | 548.65s |
Generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#43 MiMo-V2.5-Pro
medium
Invalid SVG
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.10s | 672 | 624 | 14,024 | |
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.26s | 621 | 323 | 1,179 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 5.0 | 5.1 | 44.5% | 2 | 42.85s | 7,895 | 495 | 67,967 | |
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 6.2 | 4.7 | 66.7% | 2 | 92.07s | 6,543 | 780 | 51,218 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 20.28s | 14,934 | 483 | 13,839 | |
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 53.36s | 15,060 | 348 | 11,870 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 9.65s | 7,782 | 270 | 13,155 | |
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 7.3 | 5.8 | 83.3% | 1 | 18.81s | 7,746 | 260 | 8,383 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 3.5 | 4.4 | 33.3% | 2 | 14.65s | 771 | 60 | 24,409 | |
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 37.87s | 630 | 275 | 17,023 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 4.8 | 9.9 | 0.0% | 0 | 9.88s | 516 | 140 | 5,445 | |
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 5.5 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 4.02s | 492 | 155 | 163 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.05s | 699 | 102 | 7,423 | |
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 9.9 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.77s | 672 | 82 | 803 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 6.29s | 696 | 460 | 10,860 | |
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 6.7 | 7.9 | 55.6% | 1 | 5.31s | 660 | 540 | 2,181 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.00s | 8,193 | 335 | 1,188 | |
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 16.87s | 8,220 | 311 | 2,908 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 122.87s | 204 | 26 | 87,048 | |
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 12.46s | 210 | 1,941 | 2,014 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Gemini 3 Flash PreviewnonevsMiMo-V2.5-PromediumGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewlowvsMiMo-V2.5-PromediumGemini 3 Flash PreviewnonevsQwen3.6 FlashmediumGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewlowvsQwen3.6 FlashmediumQwen3.7 MaxnonevsMiMo-V2.5-PromediumGemini 3.5 FlashminimalvsQwen3.6 FlashmediumStep 3.7 FlashlowvsMiMo-V2.5-PromediumGemini 3.5 FlashminimalvsMiMo-V2.5-PromediumDeepSeek V4 FlashhighvsQwen3.6 FlashmediumGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewnonevsMiMo-V2.5-PromediumQwen3.6 FlashmediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsMiMo-V2.5-Promedium