Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Qwen3.6 Flash (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 6.9 vs 6.9. DeepSeek V4 Pro has the lower benchmark cost at $0.139 vs $0.738. DeepSeek V4 Pro is faster at 11.55s vs 44.65s, with pass rates of 51.5% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-11

Rank
#110
Total Output Tokens
35,551
Response Time (avg)
11.55s
Total Cost
$0.139
Rank
#113
Total Output Tokens
634,338
Response Time (avg)
44.65s
Total Cost
$0.738
Recommended model DeepSeek V4 Pro

It has the best score here (6.9), while costing about 5.3x less than Qwen3.6 Flash (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric DeepSeek V4 Pro DeepSeek V4 Pro none Release: 2026-04-24 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.9 6.9
Rank #110 #113
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.6 8.2
Benchmark coverage 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 51.5% 68.2%
Flaky tests 4 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.954 6.784
Total Cost $0.139 $0.738
Input Price $0.632 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $1.264 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 148,069 129,041
Output Tokens 35,551 20,026
Reasoning Tokens 0 614,312
Response Time (avg) 11.55s 44.65s
Response Time (max) 119.44s 578.13s
Response Time (total) 254.11s 982.32s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#110 DeepSeek V4 Pro

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#113 Qwen3.6 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.008
Time
29.9s
Tokens
6,784 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V4 Pro 5.6 10.0 33.3% 0 13.38s 7,275 5,500 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.0 5.1 44.5% 2 42.85s 7,895 495 67,967

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair