Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash

The average score is effectively tied at 6.9 vs 6.9. GPT-5.6 Sol has the lower benchmark cost at $0.524 vs $0.738. GPT-5.6 Sol is faster at 2.16s vs 44.65s, with pass rates of 59.1% vs 68.2%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.6 SolIt has the best score here (6.9), while responding about 20.6x faster than Qwen3.6 Flash (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric GPT-5.6 Sol GPT-5.6 Sol none Release: 2026-07-09 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.9 6.9
Rank #80 #82
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.0 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 59.1% 68.2%
Flaky tests 3 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.761 6.784
Total Cost $0.524 $0.738
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $30.000 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 78,593 129,041
Output Tokens 4,357 20,026
Reasoning Tokens 0 614,312
Response Time (avg) 2.16s 44.65s
Response Time (max) 12.81s 578.13s
Response Time (total) 47.62s 982.32s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#80 GPT-5.6 Sol

none
Cost
$0.116
Time
78.7s
Tokens
3,944 tok

#82 Qwen3.6 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.008
Time
29.9s
Tokens
6,784 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Sol 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.39s 7,302 390 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.0 5.1 44.5% 2 42.85s 7,895 495 67,967

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair