Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro

The average score is effectively tied at 6.9 vs 6.9. MiMo-V2.5-Pro (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.187 vs $0.524. GPT-5.6 Sol is faster at 2.16s vs 33.92s, with pass rates of 59.1% vs 66.7%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.6 SolIt has the best score here (6.9), while responding about 15.7x faster than MiMo-V2.5-Pro (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric GPT-5.6 Sol GPT-5.6 Sol none Release: 2026-07-09 MiMo-V2.5-Pro MiMo-V2.5-Pro medium Release: 2026-04-22
Score 6.9 6.9
Rank #80 #81
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.0 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 59.1% 66.7%
Flaky tests 3 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.761 3.218
Total Cost $0.524 $0.187
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.435 / 1M
Output Price $30.000 / 1M $0.870 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 78,593 139,883
Output Tokens 4,357 15,521
Reasoning Tokens 0 130,992
Response Time (avg) 2.16s 33.92s
Response Time (max) 12.81s 197.54s
Response Time (total) 47.62s 746.19s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#80 GPT-5.6 Sol

none
Cost
$0.116
Time
78.7s
Tokens
3,944 tok

#81 MiMo-V2.5-Pro

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Sol 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.39s 7,302 390 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 92.07s 6,543 780 51,218

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair