Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

MiMo-V2.5-Pro (medium) vs GLM 5.3 (low)

The average score is effectively tied at 6.8 vs 6.8. MiMo-V2.5-Pro (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.221 vs $0.257. GLM 5.3 (low) is faster at 13.65s vs 48.68s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 65.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-20

Rank
#135
Total Output Tokens
185,466
Response Time (avg)
48.68s
Total Cost
$0.221
Rank
#134
Total Output Tokens
24,808
Response Time (avg)
13.65s
Total Cost
$0.257
Recommended model GLM 5.3 (low)

It has the best score here (6.8), while responding about 3.6x faster than MiMo-V2.5-Pro (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric MiMo-V2.5-Pro MiMo-V2.5-Pro medium Release: 2026-04-22 GLM 5.3 GLM 5.3 low Release: 2026-08-20
Score 6.8 6.8
Rank #135 #134
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.9 8.5
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 65.2%
Flaky tests 6 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.790 2.135
Total Cost $0.221 $0.257
Input Price $0.435 / 1M $1.400 / 1M
Output Price $0.870 / 1M $4.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 139,892 104,989
Output Tokens 15,569 8,532
Reasoning Tokens 169,897 16,276
Response Time (avg) 48.68s 13.65s
Response Time (max) 333.34s 83.60s
Response Time (total) 1071.02s 300.22s
Parameters 1.02T total (42B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Open source Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#135 MiMo-V2.5-Pro

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#134 GLM 5.3

low
Cost
$0.007
Time
28.4s
Tokens
1,599 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 92.07s 6,543 780 51,218
GLM 5.3 6.2 6.9 55.6% 1 21.02s 7,317 368 6,764

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair