Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Seed-2.0-Code (medium) vs GLM 5.3 (low)

Seed-2.0-Code (medium) leads on average score with 6.8 vs 6.8. GLM 5.3 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.257 vs $1.153. GLM 5.3 (low) is faster at 13.65s vs 101.05s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 65.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-20

Rank
#130
Total Output Tokens
371,443
Response Time (avg)
101.05s
Total Cost
$1.153
Rank
#134
Total Output Tokens
24,808
Response Time (avg)
13.65s
Total Cost
$0.257
Recommended model GLM 5.3 (low)

Its score stays close to the best score here (6.8 vs 6.8), while costing about 4.5x less than Seed-2.0-Code (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Seed-2.0-Code Seed-2.0-Code medium Release: 2026-08-12 GLM 5.3 GLM 5.3 low Release: 2026-08-20
Score 6.8 6.8
Rank #130 #134
Reliability 7.3 10.0
Consistency 7.3 8.5
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 65.2%
Flaky tests 7 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 11.524 2.135
Total Cost $1.153 $0.257
Input Price $0.500 / 1M $1.400 / 1M
Output Price $3.000 / 1M $4.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 76,036 104,989
Output Tokens 7,267 8,532
Reasoning Tokens 364,176 16,276
Response Time (avg) 101.05s 13.65s
Response Time (max) 626.58s 83.60s
Response Time (total) 2223.19s 300.22s
Parameters ~200B total (~20B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#130 Seed-2.0-Code

medium
Cost
$0.026
Time
122.8s
Tokens
8,630 tok

#134 GLM 5.3

low
Cost
$0.007
Time
28.4s
Tokens
1,599 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Code 8.9 7.8 88.9% 1 89.94s 8,247 496 44,062
GLM 5.3 6.2 6.9 55.6% 1 21.02s 7,317 368 6,764

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair